Markets · NVDA up to 20x

Nvidia overnight contract up 2.8%, MiniMax lower

Estimated turnover reached $829.4m across 74 trade.xyz equity perps priced at both endpoints. 35 fell and 38 rose between 4pm ET Thursday and 6am ET Friday.

The NvidiaNVDA+4.94% perp rose 2.76% overnight on trade.xyz. An estimated $362.6m changed hands between 4pm ET Thursday and 6am ET Friday. Its own hourly closing price went from $166.24 to $170.83 over that window. Both figures are perp prices, not stock-exchange closes. Its largest hourly move was 1.55%, between 4am and 5am ET.

The largest percentage move was elsewhere: Cerebras's perp was 16.98% higher, but on estimated turnover of $24.4m. MINIMAX-9.27% went the other way, 8.92% lower on estimated turnover of $1.5m.

Largest overnight moves among equity perps with estimated turnover of $1.0m or more
Search timestamp (ET)
Cerebras (CBRS)$97.78$114.39+16.98%$24.4m11:23pm (Thursday)
MiniMax$21.39$19.48-8.92%$1.5mNone found
Zhipu AI (ZHIPU)$57.26$52.15-8.92%$7.4mNone found
GigaDevice (GIGADEV)$38.02$36.37-4.33%$1.2m5:59pm (Thursday)
Microsoft (MSFT)$522.82$507.48-2.93%$18.5m11:23pm (Thursday)
Nvidia (NVDA)$166.24$170.83+2.76%$362.6m10:36pm (Thursday)
CXMT$6.19$6.04-2.54%$10.4mNone found
Coinbase (COIN)$130.64$127.39-2.49%$6.8mNone found
Broadcom (AVGO)$364.30$355.92-2.30%$1.3m5:04pm (Thursday)
AMD$585.12$573.07-2.06%$31.9mNone found
Ranked by absolute percentage change among perps with estimated turnover of at least $1.0m between 4:00pm ET Thursday and 6:00am ET Friday (2026-11-13). Both prices are completed trade.xyz perp hourly closes from Hyperliquid, not stock-exchange closes. Turnover is estimated from hourly volume and high-low midpoints. Search timestamps come from Bing News RSS and are not independently verified publication times. The headlines are in the sources. Search results do not establish when news first appeared or caused a move.

Nvidia alone was 44% of the estimated $829.4m traded across 74 stock perps overnight. Across the board, 35 were lower and 38 higher, in this sample.

Two moves larger than the table's smallest, 2.06%, sit outside it, because estimated turnover fell below $1.0m. The largest: BitMine fell 3.59% on estimated turnover of $139k.

The lead
Nvidia, +2.76%
$166.24 at 4pm ET Thursday in the perp, against $170.83 at 6am ET, on estimated turnover of $362.6m
Widest gap
Cerebras, +16.98%
On estimated turnover of $24.4m in the window
The split
38 up, 35 down
Of 74 stock perps priced at both ends of the window
The window
14 hours
4:00pm ET Thursday to 6:00am ET Friday

Why it matters

For a hypothetical position with $10,000 of starting exposure, the full price change implies a gross $276 gain for a long and loss for a short. This assumes the position remained open throughout, before trading fees and funding payments between longs and shorts. If backed by $1,000 of starting collateral, that price change equals 28% of the collateral. Actual margin and the path of prices determine whether liquidation could close a position before the endpoint.

The news search matched a report on Nvidia from The Wall Street Journal. The table gives search timestamps, not verified publication times. They cannot establish whether coverage preceded a move.

The contracts give price exposure without ownership of the underlying shares. Turnover shows activity, but these candles alone do not establish why a contract moved or how closely it tracked the share.

Estimated turnover sums each completed hour's contract volume multiplied by the midpoint of its high and low. It is an approximation of dollar activity, not the exact value of every execution.

What the comparison can establish

The table compares the same derivative at two times. To measure whether the Nvidia perp led or lagged the underlying security, a separate series of time-matched security prices is needed. That series is not part of this dataset.

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.