Wolfspeed

WOLFNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the WOLF thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$27.68
+$1.45 (+5.53%)Today 1M −14.31%
After hours$26.70−3.54%

Updated Nov 11, 4:02 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$26.23
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$27.13–$28.70
Regular-session low and high so far today.
2.5M
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:02 PM ET.
Not yet confirmed
The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
$13.49–$80.82
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own WOLF if its focused silicon-carbide capacity becomes economically productive before demand delays, competitors, or cash burn consume the recapitalization runway.

WOLF price history

Latest price$27.68Today+$1.45 (+5.53%)
WOLF +2.23%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

4 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • EV and industrial power customers keep valuing silicon carbide’s efficiency benefits enough to absorb Wolfspeed’s focused SiC capacity rather than reverting to cheaper silicon or delaying redesigns.HoldingMateriality: High

    The company description identifies Wolfspeed as focused on silicon carbide materials and devices for power applications. If customer pull is real, revenue can recover as capacity comes online; if not, Wolfspeed owns expensive assets without enough profitable demand.

    Watch: Major EV OEMs delay 800-volt platforms or reduce silicon-carbide content per vehicle.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    The company description identifies Wolfspeed as focused on silicon carbide materials and devices for power applications.

    Open source ↗
  • Wolfspeed’s vertically focused SiC manufacturing becomes a moat only if the materials and device ramp lifts yield and utilization faster than fixed-cost absorption, startup costs, and scrap consume pricing.WeakeningMateriality: High

    Annual GAAP gross profit was positive at $208.1 million in FY2022 and $242.9 million in FY2023, showing the model has historically produced gross profit. The business cannot create durable equity value from SiC demand unless manufacturing scale converts into positive gross profit.

    Watch: Mohawk Valley or Siler City ramp delays, yield shortfalls, or customer qualification failures prevent volume absorption.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Annual GAAP gross profit was positive at $208.1 million in FY2022 and $242.9 million in FY2023, showing the model has.

    Open source ↗
  • The post-distress balance sheet is valuable only if lower leverage restores customer and supplier confidence long enough for the SiC ramp to mature, rather than merely postponing another funding need.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    GAAP liabilities declined from $7.3015 billion at FY2025 year-end to $2.0747 billion at FY2026 year-end. A cleaner balance sheet can keep Wolfspeed in customer qualification cycles; if counterparties still doubt its durability, the operating turnaround may never get the orders it needs.

    Watch: Major customers dual-source away from Wolfspeed because of lingering solvency or supply-continuity concerns.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP liabilities declined from $7.3015 billion at FY2025 year-end to $2.0747 billion at FY2026 year-end.

    Open source ↗
  • Management must shift from capacity-build cash consumption to a self-funding operating model; otherwise SiC demand upside accrues first to creditors and new capital providers rather than common shareholders.WeakeningMateriality: Medium

    Annual GAAP operating cash flow improved slightly from negative $725.6 million in FY2024 to negative $711.7 million in FY2025, but remained deeply negative. For owners, growth only matters if it stops consuming cash and avoids further dilution or creditor claims.

    Watch: EV or industrial demand delays keep new capacity underutilized while fixed operating costs continue.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Annual GAAP operating cash flow improved slightly from negative $725.6 million in FY2024 to negative $711.7 million in FY2025, but.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

EV and industrial power customers keep valuing silicon carbide’s efficiency benefits enough to absorb Wolfspeed’s focused SiC capacity rather than reverting to cheaper silicon or delaying redesigns. If customer pull is real, revenue can recover as capacity comes online; if not, Wolfspeed owns expensive assets without enough profitable demand.

Wolfspeed’s vertically focused SiC manufacturing becomes a moat only if the materials and device ramp lifts yield and utilization faster than fixed-cost absorption, startup costs, and scrap consume pricing. The business cannot create durable equity value from SiC demand unless manufacturing scale converts into positive gross profit.

The post-distress balance sheet is valuable only if lower leverage restores customer and supplier confidence long enough for the SiC ramp to mature, rather than merely postponing another funding need. A cleaner balance sheet can keep Wolfspeed in customer qualification cycles; if counterparties still doubt its durability, the operating turnaround may never get the orders it needs.

Management must shift from capacity-build cash consumption to a self-funding operating model; otherwise SiC demand upside accrues first to creditors and new capital providers rather than common shareholders. For owners, growth only matters if it stops consuming cash and avoids further dilution or creditor claims.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

its focused silicon-carbide capacity becomes economically productive before demand delays, competitors, or cash burn consume the recapitalization runway.

Evidence assessed Oct 13, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for Wolfspeed

Where the evidence on Wolfspeed disagrees: Mixed on the latest evidence (Oct 13, 2026). Of its 4 thesis points, 1 strengthening, 1 holding and 2 weakening.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • EV and industrial power customers keep valuing silicon carbide’s efficiency benefits enough to absorb Wolfspeed’s focused SiC capacity rather than reverting to cheaper silicon or delaying redesigns.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The post-distress balance sheet is valuable only if lower leverage restores customer and supplier confidence long enough for the SiC ramp to mature, rather than merely postponing another funding need.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what the evidence questions

  • Wolfspeed’s vertically focused SiC manufacturing becomes a moat only if the materials and device ramp lifts yield and utilization faster than fixed-cost absorption, startup costs, and scrap consume pricing.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Management must shift from capacity-build cash consumption to a self-funding operating model; otherwise SiC demand upside accrues first to creditors and new capital providers rather than common shareholders.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · Wolfspeed

Loading the break-condition record for Wolfspeed.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Regulation FD disclosure.

    Wolfspeed filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-07: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Other material event.

    Wolfspeed filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-16: Other material event. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Director or principal officer change.

    Wolfspeed filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-08-25: Director or principal officer change. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • Major EV OEMs delay 800-volt platforms or reduce silicon-carbide content per vehicle.
  • Mohawk Valley or Siler City ramp delays, yield shortfalls, or customer qualification failures prevent volume absorption.
  • Major customers dual-source away from Wolfspeed because of lingering solvency or supply-continuity concerns.
  • EV or industrial demand delays keep new capacity underutilized while fixed operating costs continue.

WOLF news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

WOLF income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

WOLF: quick answers

Which well-known investors own WOLF?
2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported WOLF shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio), 0.0%; Third Point (Dan Loeb), 0.0%. Fund portfolios

WOLF in well-known investors’ portfolios

2 of 37 funds reported WOLF shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.

FundOf its portfolioValueChangeQuarter
Ray DalioBridgewater Associates0.01%$1.8MNewQ2 2026
Dan LoebThird Point0.01%$483KNewQ2 2026

Every fund’s portfolio

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.