Wolfspeed
WOLFNYSEUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- $26.23 Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- $27.13–$28.70 Regular-session low and high so far today.
- 2.5M Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:02 PM ET.
- Not yet confirmed The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
- $13.49–$80.82 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own WOLF if its focused silicon-carbide capacity becomes economically productive before demand delays, competitors, or cash burn consume the recapitalization runway.
WOLF price history
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
EV and industrial power customers keep valuing silicon carbide’s efficiency benefits enough to absorb Wolfspeed’s focused SiC capacity rather than reverting to cheaper silicon or delaying redesigns.HoldingMateriality: High
The company description identifies Wolfspeed as focused on silicon carbide materials and devices for power applications. If customer pull is real, revenue can recover as capacity comes online; if not, Wolfspeed owns expensive assets without enough profitable demand.
Watch: Major EV OEMs delay 800-volt platforms or reduce silicon-carbide content per vehicle.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
The company description identifies Wolfspeed as focused on silicon carbide materials and devices for power applications.
Open source ↗Wolfspeed’s vertically focused SiC manufacturing becomes a moat only if the materials and device ramp lifts yield and utilization faster than fixed-cost absorption, startup costs, and scrap consume pricing.WeakeningMateriality: High
Annual GAAP gross profit was positive at $208.1 million in FY2022 and $242.9 million in FY2023, showing the model has historically produced gross profit. The business cannot create durable equity value from SiC demand unless manufacturing scale converts into positive gross profit.
Watch: Mohawk Valley or Siler City ramp delays, yield shortfalls, or customer qualification failures prevent volume absorption.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Annual GAAP gross profit was positive at $208.1 million in FY2022 and $242.9 million in FY2023, showing the model has.
Open source ↗The post-distress balance sheet is valuable only if lower leverage restores customer and supplier confidence long enough for the SiC ramp to mature, rather than merely postponing another funding need.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
GAAP liabilities declined from $7.3015 billion at FY2025 year-end to $2.0747 billion at FY2026 year-end. A cleaner balance sheet can keep Wolfspeed in customer qualification cycles; if counterparties still doubt its durability, the operating turnaround may never get the orders it needs.
Watch: Major customers dual-source away from Wolfspeed because of lingering solvency or supply-continuity concerns.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
GAAP liabilities declined from $7.3015 billion at FY2025 year-end to $2.0747 billion at FY2026 year-end.
Open source ↗Management must shift from capacity-build cash consumption to a self-funding operating model; otherwise SiC demand upside accrues first to creditors and new capital providers rather than common shareholders.WeakeningMateriality: Medium
Annual GAAP operating cash flow improved slightly from negative $725.6 million in FY2024 to negative $711.7 million in FY2025, but remained deeply negative. For owners, growth only matters if it stops consuming cash and avoids further dilution or creditor claims.
Watch: EV or industrial demand delays keep new capacity underutilized while fixed operating costs continue.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Annual GAAP operating cash flow improved slightly from negative $725.6 million in FY2024 to negative $711.7 million in FY2025, but.
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
EV and industrial power customers keep valuing silicon carbide’s efficiency benefits enough to absorb Wolfspeed’s focused SiC capacity rather than reverting to cheaper silicon or delaying redesigns. If customer pull is real, revenue can recover as capacity comes online; if not, Wolfspeed owns expensive assets without enough profitable demand.
Wolfspeed’s vertically focused SiC manufacturing becomes a moat only if the materials and device ramp lifts yield and utilization faster than fixed-cost absorption, startup costs, and scrap consume pricing. The business cannot create durable equity value from SiC demand unless manufacturing scale converts into positive gross profit.
The post-distress balance sheet is valuable only if lower leverage restores customer and supplier confidence long enough for the SiC ramp to mature, rather than merely postponing another funding need. A cleaner balance sheet can keep Wolfspeed in customer qualification cycles; if counterparties still doubt its durability, the operating turnaround may never get the orders it needs.
Management must shift from capacity-build cash consumption to a self-funding operating model; otherwise SiC demand upside accrues first to creditors and new capital providers rather than common shareholders. For owners, growth only matters if it stops consuming cash and avoids further dilution or creditor claims.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
its focused silicon-carbide capacity becomes economically productive before demand delays, competitors, or cash burn consume the recapitalization runway.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for Wolfspeed
Where the evidence on Wolfspeed disagrees: Mixed on the latest evidence (Oct 13, 2026). Of its 4 thesis points, 1 strengthening, 1 holding and 2 weakening.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
EV and industrial power customers keep valuing silicon carbide’s efficiency benefits enough to absorb Wolfspeed’s focused SiC capacity rather than reverting to cheaper silicon or delaying redesigns.
The post-distress balance sheet is valuable only if lower leverage restores customer and supplier confidence long enough for the SiC ramp to mature, rather than merely postponing another funding need.
Bear case: what the evidence questions
Wolfspeed’s vertically focused SiC manufacturing becomes a moat only if the materials and device ramp lifts yield and utilization faster than fixed-cost absorption, startup costs, and scrap consume pricing.
Management must shift from capacity-build cash consumption to a self-funding operating model; otherwise SiC demand upside accrues first to creditors and new capital providers rather than common shareholders.
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · Wolfspeed
Loading the break-condition record for Wolfspeed.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
- MixedRegulation FD disclosure.
Wolfspeed filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-07: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedOther material event.
Wolfspeed filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-16: Other material event. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedDirector or principal officer change.
Wolfspeed filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-08-25: Director or principal officer change. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- Major EV OEMs delay 800-volt platforms or reduce silicon-carbide content per vehicle.
- Mohawk Valley or Siler City ramp delays, yield shortfalls, or customer qualification failures prevent volume absorption.
- Major customers dual-source away from Wolfspeed because of lingering solvency or supply-continuity concerns.
- EV or industrial demand delays keep new capacity underutilized while fixed operating costs continue.
WOLF news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
WOLF income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
WOLF: quick answers
- Which well-known investors own WOLF?
- 2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported WOLF shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio), 0.0%; Third Point (Dan Loeb), 0.0%. Fund portfolios
WOLF in well-known investors’ portfolios
2 of 37 funds reported WOLF shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.
| Fund | Of its portfolio | Value | Change | Quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray DalioBridgewater Associates | 0.01% | $1.8M | New | Q2 2026 |
| Dan LoebThird Point | 0.01% | $483K | New | Q2 2026 |
