USA Rare Earth
USARNASDAQUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- $7.92 Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- $8.18–$8.83 Regular-session low and high so far today.
- 16.5M Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
- Jan 25 projected Projected for 2027-01-25 from the company’s own results filings (SEC 8-K Item 2.02). The company has not confirmed the date.
- $6.84–$32.80 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own USAR if the company turns strategic relevance into qualified commercial production before cash burn and dilution overwhelm owners.
USAR price history
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
Strategic buyers will increasingly qualify USA Rare Earth as a non-China rare-earth and magnet supplier, so geopolitical supply-chain risk converts into commercial demand rather than remaining only a policy narrative.HoldingMateriality: High
GAAP annual revenue moved from $0 in FY2024 to $1.643 million in FY2025, showing the company has begun commercial activity. If qualification and offtake happen, revenue can become evidence of real customer pull; if not, the company remains a costly development project.
Watch: Automakers, defense suppliers, or industrial customers continue sourcing from established Chinese or other incumbent suppliers despite stated supply-chain concerns.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
GAAP annual revenue moved from $0 in FY2024 to $1.643 million in FY2025, showing the company has begun commercial activity.
Open source ↗Vertical integration into rare earth elements, oxides, metals and magnets must produce differentiated unit economics, not just exposure to volatile commodity prices.HoldingMateriality: High
GAAP annual gross profit was $195,000 in FY2025 on the company’s first reported revenue base. Positive, improving unit economics would support eventual operating leverage; weak spreads would make growth value-destructive.
Watch: China-linked producers cut rare earth oxide or magnet prices enough to make domestic production uneconomic.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
GAAP annual gross profit was $195,000 in FY2025 on the company’s first reported revenue base.
Open source ↗The company’s enlarged liquidity must fund the commercialization runway long enough to reach customer and production milestones without forcing punitive financing.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
Cash and cash equivalents increased from $16.761 million at FY2024 year-end to $359.925 million at FY2025 year-end. For owners, the same strategic opportunity can compound or be diluted away depending on whether cash gets the company to scale.
Watch: Processing, mining, or magnet facility costs materially exceed plan before revenue scales.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Cash and cash equivalents increased from $16.761 million at FY2024 year-end to $359.925 million at FY2025 year-end.
Open source ↗Management must turn the current buildout cost base into operating leverage as production ramps, rather than allowing public-company, technical and commercialization costs to scale ahead of demand.WeakeningMateriality: Medium
The company has built an operating organization with 132 full-time employees as of December 31, 2025. If fixed costs are absorbed, equity value can shift from option value to earnings power; if not, losses consume the balance sheet.
Watch: Hiring and overhead continue rising before facilities reach reliable production volumes.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
The company has built an operating organization with 132 full-time employees as of December 31, 2025.
Open source ↗The capital structure must remain clean enough that any strategic upside accrues to common shareholders rather than creditors, preferred holders or future diluted equity investors.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
Stockholders’ equity increased from $34.021 million at FY2024 year-end to $494.286 million at FY2025 year-end. A successful project can still be a poor stock if the funding stack captures the value before common shareholders do.
Watch: Large new equity raises are required before commercial milestones validate the business.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Stockholders’ equity increased from $34.021 million at FY2024 year-end to $494.286 million at FY2025 year-end.
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
Strategic buyers will increasingly qualify USA Rare Earth as a non-China rare-earth and magnet supplier, so geopolitical supply-chain risk converts into commercial demand rather than remaining only a policy narrative. If qualification and offtake happen, revenue can become evidence of real customer pull; if not, the company remains a costly development project.
Vertical integration into rare earth elements, oxides, metals and magnets must produce differentiated unit economics, not just exposure to volatile commodity prices. Positive, improving unit economics would support eventual operating leverage; weak spreads would make growth value-destructive.
The company’s enlarged liquidity must fund the commercialization runway long enough to reach customer and production milestones without forcing punitive financing. For owners, the same strategic opportunity can compound or be diluted away depending on whether cash gets the company to scale.
Management must turn the current buildout cost base into operating leverage as production ramps, rather than allowing public-company, technical and commercialization costs to scale ahead of demand. If fixed costs are absorbed, equity value can shift from option value to earnings power; if not, losses consume the balance sheet.
The capital structure must remain clean enough that any strategic upside accrues to common shareholders rather than creditors, preferred holders or future diluted equity investors. A successful project can still be a poor stock if the funding stack captures the value before common shareholders do.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
the company turns strategic relevance into qualified commercial production before cash burn and dilution overwhelm owners.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for USA Rare Earth
Where the evidence on USA Rare Earth disagrees: Mixed on the latest evidence (Nov 1, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 2 strengthening, 2 holding and 1 weakening.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
Strategic buyers will increasingly qualify USA Rare Earth as a non-China rare-earth and magnet supplier, so geopolitical supply-chain risk converts into commercial demand rather than remaining only a policy narrative.
Vertical integration into rare earth elements, oxides, metals and magnets must produce differentiated unit economics, not just exposure to volatile commodity prices.
The company’s enlarged liquidity must fund the commercialization runway long enough to reach customer and production milestones without forcing punitive financing.
The capital structure must remain clean enough that any strategic upside accrues to common shareholders rather than creditors, preferred holders or future diluted equity investors.
Bear case: what the evidence questions
Management must turn the current buildout cost base into operating leverage as production ramps, rather than allowing public-company, technical and commercialization costs to scale ahead of demand.
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · USA Rare Earth
No break has crossed USA Rare Earth’s thesis. Its break conditions are checked against every new filing as it lands.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
- MixedRegulation FD disclosure.
USA Rare Earth filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-01: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedOther material event.
USA Rare Earth filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-15: Other material event. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedCompleted an acquisition or disposition of assets.
USA Rare Earth filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-04: Completed an acquisition or disposition of assets. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- Automakers, defense suppliers, or industrial customers continue sourcing from established Chinese or other incumbent suppliers despite stated supply-chain concerns.
- China-linked producers cut rare earth oxide or magnet prices enough to make domestic production uneconomic.
- Processing, mining, or magnet facility costs materially exceed plan before revenue scales.
- Hiring and overhead continue rising before facilities reach reliable production volumes.
- Large new equity raises are required before commercial milestones validate the business.
USAR news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
USAR income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
USAR: quick answers
- When does USA Rare Earth (USAR) report earnings next?
- USA Rare Earth's next results are projected for January 25, 2027, from the dates of its own results filings with the SEC. The company has not confirmed the date. It last reported on November 9, 2026. Earnings calendar
- What is USAR's short interest?
- As of October 30, 2026, 58.1M USAR shares were sold short, up 12.8% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 4.8 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. USAR short interest history
- Which well-known investors own USAR?
- 2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported USAR shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio), 0.0%; Soros Fund Management (George Soros), 0.0%. Fund portfolios
USAR in well-known investors’ portfolios
2 of 37 funds reported USAR shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.
| Fund | Of its portfolio | Value | Change | Quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray DalioBridgewater Associates | 0.02% | $4.0M | +7.2% | Q2 2026 |
| George SorosSoros Fund Management | 0.01% | $674K | +48.7% | Q2 2026 |
