The Timken Company

TKRNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the TKR thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$110.56
+$1.37 (+1.25%)Today 1M −5.97%
After hours$111.03+0.43%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$109.19
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$109.05–$111.80
Regular-session low and high so far today.
757.9K
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Not yet confirmed
The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
$73.62–$146.37
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own TKR if its application-critical bearing know-how keeps customers paying for reliability while management restores margins and turns that installed base into cash.

TKR price history

Latest price$110.56Today+$1.37 (+1.25%)
TKR -4.65%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

5 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • Customers continue to choose Timken for application-critical bearing reliability and qualification support rather than switching primarily on price, so cyclical end-market demand still converts into durable sales when volumes normalize.HoldingMateriality: High

    GAAP annual revenue was $4.5818 billion in FY2025 versus $4.5730 billion in FY2024, showing stability despite a softer earnings year. If this holds, revenue resilience has a moat behind it; if it breaks, Timken becomes a lower-multiple commodity manufacturer.

    Watch: SKF, Schaeffler, NSK, NTN or JTEKT win major OEM or distributor qualifications by offering comparable bearing performance at lower prices.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual revenue was $4.5818 billion in FY2025 versus $4.5730 billion in FY2024, showing stability despite a softer earnings year.

    Open source ↗
  • Timken’s manufacturing scale and pricing discipline can restore operating leverage once industrial volumes improve, rather than letting cost inflation, mix and under-absorption permanently reset margins lower.WeakeningMateriality: High

    GAAP annual operating income was $540.6 million in FY2025, still profitable through a weak period. Margin recovery is the difference between a cyclical earnings trough and a structurally impaired business.

    Watch: Customers refuse price increases or demand concessions as contracts reset, indicating bearing pricing power has weakened.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual operating income was $540.6 million in FY2025, still profitable through a weak period.

    Open source ↗
  • The aftermarket, replacement and working-capital characteristics of Timken’s bearing franchise keep cash generation resilient even when reported earnings are pressured.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    GAAP annual operating cash flow was $554.3 million in FY2025, above $475.7 million in FY2024. Durable operating cash flow gives Timken flexibility to reinvest, reduce leverage, pay dividends or repurchase shares through the cycle.

    Watch: A distributor or OEM destocking cycle forces Timken to carry excess inventory and consumes working capital before revenue clearly rolls over.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual operating cash flow was $554.3 million in FY2025, above $475.7 million in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
  • Timken’s acquisition and reinvestment strategy must add differentiated products or channels rather than merely expanding the asset base, because asset growth without earnings growth would dilute returns.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    Total assets were $6.6768 billion at FY2025 year-end, up from $6.4110 billion at FY2024 year-end. If incremental assets do not produce higher earnings and cash flow, per-share compounding stalls even if the company remains operationally sound.

    Watch: Acquired product lines fail to cross-sell through Timken’s channels or carry lower structural margins than the legacy bearing franchise.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Total assets were $6.6768 billion at FY2025 year-end, up from $6.4110 billion at FY2024 year-end.

    Open source ↗
  • Per-share value creation depends on earnings power recovering from cyclical pressure, because recent revenue stability has not prevented GAAP diluted EPS from declining.WeakeningMateriality: Medium

    GAAP diluted EPS was $4.11 in FY2025, down from $4.99 in FY2024. Owners need margin and capital-allocation recovery, not just a stable top line, for the stock to compound.

    Watch: Industrial demand recovers but Timken’s EPS does not because price/cost, mix or utilization remain unfavorable.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP diluted EPS was $4.11 in FY2025, down from $4.99 in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

Customers continue to choose Timken for application-critical bearing reliability and qualification support rather than switching primarily on price, so cyclical end-market demand still converts into durable sales when volumes normalize. If this holds, revenue resilience has a moat behind it; if it breaks, Timken becomes a lower-multiple commodity manufacturer.

Timken’s manufacturing scale and pricing discipline can restore operating leverage once industrial volumes improve, rather than letting cost inflation, mix and under-absorption permanently reset margins lower. Margin recovery is the difference between a cyclical earnings trough and a structurally impaired business.

The aftermarket, replacement and working-capital characteristics of Timken’s bearing franchise keep cash generation resilient even when reported earnings are pressured. Durable operating cash flow gives Timken flexibility to reinvest, reduce leverage, pay dividends or repurchase shares through the cycle.

Timken’s acquisition and reinvestment strategy must add differentiated products or channels rather than merely expanding the asset base, because asset growth without earnings growth would dilute returns. If incremental assets do not produce higher earnings and cash flow, per-share compounding stalls even if the company remains operationally sound.

Per-share value creation depends on earnings power recovering from cyclical pressure, because recent revenue stability has not prevented GAAP diluted EPS from declining. Owners need margin and capital-allocation recovery, not just a stable top line, for the stock to compound.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

its application-critical bearing know-how keeps customers paying for reliability while management restores margins and turns that installed base into cash.

Evidence assessed Oct 15, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for Timken Co

Where the evidence on Timken Co disagrees: Mixed on the latest evidence (Oct 15, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 1 strengthening, 2 holding and 2 weakening.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • Customers continue to choose Timken for application-critical bearing reliability and qualification support rather than switching primarily on price, so cyclical end-market demand still converts into durable sales when volumes normalize.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The aftermarket, replacement and working-capital characteristics of Timken’s bearing franchise keep cash generation resilient even when reported earnings are pressured.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Timken’s acquisition and reinvestment strategy must add differentiated products or channels rather than merely expanding the asset base, because asset growth without earnings growth would dilute returns.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what the evidence questions

  • Timken’s manufacturing scale and pricing discipline can restore operating leverage once industrial volumes improve, rather than letting cost inflation, mix and under-absorption permanently reset margins lower.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Per-share value creation depends on earnings power recovering from cyclical pressure, because recent revenue stability has not prevented GAAP diluted EPS from declining.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · Timken Co

Loading the break-condition record for Timken Co.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    Timken Co filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-08-04: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Director or principal officer change.

    Timken Co filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-07-31: Director or principal officer change. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Entered a material definitive agreement.

    Timken Co filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-07-06: Entered a material definitive agreement. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • SKF, Schaeffler, NSK, NTN or JTEKT win major OEM or distributor qualifications by offering comparable bearing performance at lower prices.
  • Customers refuse price increases or demand concessions as contracts reset, indicating bearing pricing power has weakened.
  • A distributor or OEM destocking cycle forces Timken to carry excess inventory and consumes working capital before revenue clearly rolls over.
  • Acquired product lines fail to cross-sell through Timken’s channels or carry lower structural margins than the legacy bearing franchise.
  • Industrial demand recovers but Timken’s EPS does not because price/cost, mix or utilization remain unfavorable.

TKR news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

TKR income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

TKR: quick answers

Have members of Congress traded TKR?
8 trades in TKR have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed TKR trade
Which well-known investors own TKR?
2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported TKR shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio), 0.2%; Soros Fund Management (George Soros), 0.1%. Fund portfolios

TKR in well-known investors’ portfolios

2 of 37 funds reported TKR shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.

FundOf its portfolioValueChangeQuarter
Ray DalioBridgewater Associates0.18%$44.0M+57.7%Q2 2026
George SorosSoros Fund Management0.12%$10.2MNewQ2 2026

Every fund’s portfolio

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.