Redwood Trust
RWTNYSEUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- $2.97 Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- $2.86–$2.99 Regular-session low and high so far today.
- 4.0M Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
- Not yet confirmed The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
- $2.69–$6.97 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own RWT if Redwood Trust earns a return by scaling mortgage credit assets funded with wholesale liabilities; its value depends on preserving asset yields versus funding costs and avoiding large mark-to-market or credit losses that erode equity.
RWT price history
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
Redwood's growing asset base can generate higher recurring interest and fee income only if net interest margins (asset yields minus funding costs and hedging losses) are preserved; asset scale alone does not create value without stable spreads.HoldingMateriality: High
assets rose from 13,030,899,000 (2022) to 23,701,114,000 (2025), showing capacity to scale the earning base. If spreads hold, asset growth converts directly into revenue and earnings; if spreads compress, scale can amplify losses and equity erosion.
Watch: sustained compression of net interest margin or rising funding costs that reduce spread (e.g., wholesale funding tightening).
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
assets rose from 13,030,899,000 (2022) to 23,701,114,000 (2025), showing capacity to scale the earning base.
Open source ↗Because Redwood funds a large share of assets with liabilities, changes in the spread between asset yields and funding costs will be amplified by leverage — positive spreads drive elevated returns, negative spreads quickly erode equity.StrengtheningMateriality: High
liabilities increased from 11,946,914,000 (2022) to 22,718,498,000 (2025), tracking asset growth and indicating substantial leverage. High leverage is the mechanism that turns spread management into outsized ROE or into rapid equity loss; monitoring liability growth and funding terms is therefore critical.
Watch: a sudden increase in the cost or withdrawal of wholesale funding (repo or warehouse lines) or higher haircuts on secured funding.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
liabilities increased from 11,946,914,000 (2022) to 22,718,498,000 (2025), tracking asset growth and indicating substantial leverage.
Open source ↗Redwood's net income will remain volatile because earnings are materially affected by market-value marks and credit provisions; predictable core earnings depend on materially reducing those swings through hedging and underwriting.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
net income swung from 319,613,000 (2021) to -163,520,000 (2022), then small loss in 2023 and profit in 2024 before a -70,026,000 loss in 2025 — large volatility in reported earnings. If marks and provisions are controlled, investors can expect steadier earnings and dividend capacity; if not, headline net income will continue to swing and impair equity.
Watch: evidence that hedging programs or conservative underwriting meaningfully reduce mark-to-market and credit volatility (e.g., disclosure of improved hedge effectiveness or narrower mark swings).
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
net income swung from 319,613,000 (2021) to -163,520,000 (2022), then small loss in 2023 and profit in 2024 before a.
Open source ↗Redwood's small cash buffer relative to the size of its balance sheet and its large negative operating cash flows leaves it dependent on continuous access to external funding; a funding market disruption would force sales or dilution.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
cash balances have been modest (e.g., 450,000,000 in 2021. Funding loss or much more expensive funding would force asset sales, realize losses, and dilute or destroy equity; continued access preserves the business model.
Watch: loss of access to secured funding markets, warehousing, or repo lines during a stress event.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
cash balances have been modest (e.g., 450,000,000 in 2021.
Open source ↗For Redwood to produce sustainable shareholder value it must materially reduce its large negative operating cash flows (convert accounting earnings into cash or show committed funding that explains the negative flows); continued persistent large negative operating cash flow will require.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
operating_cash_flow was -5,862,524,000 (2024) and -10,094,521,000 (2025), demonstrating very large negative cash generation in recent years. Operating cash flow conversion is the clearest path to distributable cash and to stabilizing equity; without it, dividends and buybacks are at risk and the company remains dependent on capital markets.
Watch: evidence of new long-term committed funding or structural funding sources that legitimately substitute for operating cash generation.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
operating_cash_flow was -5,862,524,000 (2024) and -10,094,521,000 (2025), demonstrating very large negative cash generation in recent years.
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
Redwood's growing asset base can generate higher recurring interest and fee income only if net interest margins (asset yields minus funding costs and hedging losses) are preserved; asset scale alone does not create value without stable spreads. If spreads hold, asset growth converts directly into revenue and earnings; if spreads compress, scale can amplify losses and equity erosion.
Because Redwood funds a large share of assets with liabilities, changes in the spread between asset yields and funding costs will be amplified by leverage — positive spreads drive elevated returns, negative spreads quickly erode equity. High leverage is the mechanism that turns spread management into outsized ROE or into rapid equity loss; monitoring liability growth and funding terms is therefore critical.
Redwood's net income will remain volatile because earnings are materially affected by market-value marks and credit provisions; predictable core earnings depend on materially reducing those swings through hedging and underwriting. If marks and provisions are controlled, investors can expect steadier earnings and dividend capacity; if not, headline net income will continue to swing and impair equity.
Redwood's small cash buffer relative to the size of its balance sheet and its large negative operating cash flows leaves it dependent on continuous access to external funding; a funding market disruption would force sales or dilution. Funding loss or much more expensive funding would force asset sales, realize losses, and dilute or destroy equity; continued access preserves the business model.
For Redwood to produce sustainable shareholder value it must materially reduce its large negative operating cash flows (convert accounting earnings into cash or show committed funding that explains the negative flows); continued persistent large negative operating cash flow will require. Operating cash flow conversion is the clearest path to distributable cash and to stabilizing equity; without it, dividends and buybacks are at risk and the company remains dependent on capital markets.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
Redwood Trust earns a return by scaling mortgage credit assets funded with wholesale liabilities; its value depends on preserving asset yields versus funding costs and avoiding large mark-to-market or credit losses that erode equity.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for Redwood Trust
Where the evidence on Redwood Trust stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Oct 12, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 4 strengthening and 1 holding.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
Redwood's growing asset base can generate higher recurring interest and fee income only if net interest margins (asset yields minus funding costs and hedging losses) are preserved; asset scale alone does not create value without stable spreads.
Because Redwood funds a large share of assets with liabilities, changes in the spread between asset yields and funding costs will be amplified by leverage — positive spreads drive elevated returns, negative spreads quickly erode equity.
Redwood's net income will remain volatile because earnings are materially affected by market-value marks and credit provisions; predictable core earnings depend on materially reducing those swings through hedging and underwriting.
Redwood's small cash buffer relative to the size of its balance sheet and its large negative operating cash flows leaves it dependent on continuous access to external funding; a funding market disruption would force sales or dilution.
For Redwood to produce sustainable shareholder value it must materially reduce its large negative operating cash flows (convert accounting earnings into cash or show committed funding that explains the negative flows); continued persistent large negative operating cash flow will require.
Bear case: what would count against it
sustained compression of net interest margin or rising funding costs that reduce spread (e.g., wholesale funding tightening).
a sudden increase in the cost or withdrawal of wholesale funding (repo or warehouse lines) or higher haircuts on secured funding.
evidence that hedging programs or conservative underwriting meaningfully reduce mark-to-market and credit volatility (e.g., disclosure of improved hedge effectiveness or narrower mark swings).
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · Redwood Trust
Loading the break-condition record for Redwood Trust.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
- MixedEntered a material definitive agreement.
Redwood Trust filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-15: Entered a material definitive agreement. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedRegulation FD disclosure.
Redwood Trust filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-10: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedReported results of operations (earnings release).
Redwood Trust filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-07-28: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- sustained compression of net interest margin or rising funding costs that reduce spread (e.g., wholesale funding tightening).
- a sudden increase in the cost or withdrawal of wholesale funding (repo or warehouse lines) or higher haircuts on secured funding.
- evidence that hedging programs or conservative underwriting meaningfully reduce mark-to-market and credit volatility (e.g., disclosure of improved hedge effectiveness or narrower mark swings).
- loss of access to secured funding markets, warehousing, or repo lines during a stress event.
- evidence of new long-term committed funding or structural funding sources that legitimately substitute for operating cash generation.
RWT news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
RWT income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
RWT: quick answers
- Have members of Congress traded RWT?
- 4 trades in RWT have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed RWT trade
