RELX
RELXNYSEUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- $39.91 Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- $39.65–$40.19 Regular-session low and high so far today.
- 1.3M Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
- Not yet confirmed The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
- $27.57–$43.36 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own RELX if RELX turns specialized, subscription information and analytics into predictable, high-margin cash flow; scale, product mix and pricing power drive margin expansion and cash returns, while disciplined capital allocation converts those cash flows into per-share.
RELX price history
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
RELX’s recurring, mission-critical subscription contracts (not one-off sales) are the causal driver of predictable top-line growth and strong cash conversion, so retention and renewal metrics, if intact, will keep revenue and operating cash flow stable.StrengtheningMateriality: High
Revenue increased steadily from £7.244bn (2021) to £9.590bn (2025), indicating durable topline growth. If retention and subscription pricing hold, investors get predictable revenue and high operating cash flow; if customers start defecting or demand shifts to low-cost alternatives, revenue and cash will weaken quickly.
Watch: Large customers migrating to competing platforms (Thomson Reuters, Wolters Kluwer) or to new AI-driven free tools reducing willingness to pay.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Revenue increased steadily from £7.244bn (2021) to £9.590bn (2025), indicating durable topline growth.
Open source ↗Scale and a shift toward higher-value digital analytics products cause above-average operating margins versus commodity businesses; as digital mix increases, operating leverage should sustain or raise operating_income margins.StrengtheningMateriality: High
Operating income rose from £1.884bn (2021) to £3.027bn (2025) while revenue also grew, implying margin expansion. Sustained margin expansion amplifies free cash flow and validates a premium multiple; conversely, pricing pressure or costly investment cycles will compress margins and destroy value.
Watch: Aggressive competitor pricing (Thomson Reuters, Wolters Kluwer) or new entrants bundling analytics for free/low-cost could force price cuts.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Operating income rose from £1.884bn (2021) to £3.027bn (2025) while revenue also grew, implying margin expansion.
Open source ↗High operating cash flow (driven by recurring revenue and margins) causes reliable free-cash-generation that the company can deploy to buybacks/dividends and therefore compound per-share value.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
Operating cash flow rose from £2.401bn (2021) to £2.836bn (2025), and exceeds net income in recent years (operating cash flow > net income in 2025), showing strong cash conversion. If cash generation stays strong, capital returns and modest acquisition activity will grow EPS/share; if cash conversion falls or capex/acquisitions rise materially, per-share returns will slow.
Watch: A sudden need to fund large acquisitions or a sustained step-up in working capital or capex that reduces distributable cash.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Operating cash flow rose from £2.401bn (2021) to £2.836bn (2025), and exceeds net income in recent years (operating cash flow.
Open source ↗RELX’s capital allocation (returns + M&A) is the causal mechanism that translates cash flow into per-share value, but recent material drop in reported equity suggests either heavy returns, FX/other accounting effects, or impairments that could change leverage dynamics; continued equity.HoldingMateriality: Medium
Equity declined from £3.504bn (2024) to £2.390bn (2025), a substantial change that needs explanation in the 20-F/MD&A. If equity continues to fall while liabilities stay steady or rise, leverage and financial flexibility are impaired; if equity fell for one-off accounting (FX/one-time items) and cash conversion remains strong, returns remain sustainable.
Watch: Sustained large buybacks or dividend payments without offsetting cash generation, or large acquisitions funded by debt that materially increase liabilities and interest burden.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Equity declined from £3.504bn (2024) to £2.390bn (2025), a substantial change that needs explanation in the 20-F/MD&A.
Open source ↗A sustained shift to higher-margin digital products and services drives gross_profit expansion and supports pricing power; if mix reverses to lower-margin activities (e.g., commoditized content or heavily discounted offerings), gross margins will compress.HoldingMateriality: Medium
Gross profit rose from £4.682bn (2021) to £6.357bn (2025) while revenue grew, implying stable-to-improving product economics over the period. Improving gross margins provide room for investment and higher operating margins; margin compression would force either price increases (risking churn) or margin-sacrificing measures.
Watch: Structural changes in academic publishing (open access) or free AI data sources that reduce willingness to pay for data/content.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Gross profit rose from £4.682bn (2021) to £6.357bn (2025) while revenue grew, implying stable-to-improving product economics over the period.
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
RELX’s recurring, mission-critical subscription contracts (not one-off sales) are the causal driver of predictable top-line growth and strong cash conversion, so retention and renewal metrics, if intact, will keep revenue and operating cash flow stable. If retention and subscription pricing hold, investors get predictable revenue and high operating cash flow; if customers start defecting or demand shifts to low-cost alternatives, revenue and cash will weaken quickly.
Scale and a shift toward higher-value digital analytics products cause above-average operating margins versus commodity businesses; as digital mix increases, operating leverage should sustain or raise operating_income margins. Sustained margin expansion amplifies free cash flow and validates a premium multiple; conversely, pricing pressure or costly investment cycles will compress margins and destroy value.
High operating cash flow (driven by recurring revenue and margins) causes reliable free-cash-generation that the company can deploy to buybacks/dividends and therefore compound per-share value. If cash generation stays strong, capital returns and modest acquisition activity will grow EPS/share; if cash conversion falls or capex/acquisitions rise materially, per-share returns will slow.
RELX’s capital allocation (returns + M&A) is the causal mechanism that translates cash flow into per-share value, but recent material drop in reported equity suggests either heavy returns, FX/other accounting effects, or impairments that could change leverage dynamics; continued equity. If equity continues to fall while liabilities stay steady or rise, leverage and financial flexibility are impaired; if equity fell for one-off accounting (FX/one-time items) and cash conversion remains strong, returns remain sustainable.
A sustained shift to higher-margin digital products and services drives gross_profit expansion and supports pricing power; if mix reverses to lower-margin activities (e.g., commoditized content or heavily discounted offerings), gross margins will compress. Improving gross margins provide room for investment and higher operating margins; margin compression would force either price increases (risking churn) or margin-sacrificing measures.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
RELX turns specialized, subscription information and analytics into predictable, high-margin cash flow; scale, product mix and pricing power drive margin expansion and cash returns, while disciplined capital allocation converts those cash flows into per-share.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for RELX
Where the evidence on RELX stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 11, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 3 strengthening and 2 holding.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
RELX’s recurring, mission-critical subscription contracts (not one-off sales) are the causal driver of predictable top-line growth and strong cash conversion, so retention and renewal metrics, if intact, will keep revenue and operating cash flow stable.
Scale and a shift toward higher-value digital analytics products cause above-average operating margins versus commodity businesses; as digital mix increases, operating leverage should sustain or raise operating_income margins.
High operating cash flow (driven by recurring revenue and margins) causes reliable free-cash-generation that the company can deploy to buybacks/dividends and therefore compound per-share value.
RELX’s capital allocation (returns + M&A) is the causal mechanism that translates cash flow into per-share value, but recent material drop in reported equity suggests either heavy returns, FX/other accounting effects, or impairments that could change leverage dynamics; continued equity.
A sustained shift to higher-margin digital products and services drives gross_profit expansion and supports pricing power; if mix reverses to lower-margin activities (e.g., commoditized content or heavily discounted offerings), gross margins will compress.
Bear case: what would count against it
Large customers migrating to competing platforms (Thomson Reuters, Wolters Kluwer) or to new AI-driven free tools reducing willingness to pay.
Aggressive competitor pricing (Thomson Reuters, Wolters Kluwer) or new entrants bundling analytics for free/low-cost could force price cuts.
A sudden need to fund large acquisitions or a sustained step-up in working capital or capex that reduces distributable cash.
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · RELX
Loading the break-condition record for RELX.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
- MixedForeign issuer material report (6-K).
RELX filed an SEC report on 2026-11-02: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedForeign issuer material report (6-K).
RELX filed an SEC report on 2026-10-23: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedForeign issuer material report (6-K).
RELX filed an SEC report on 2026-10-22: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- Large customers migrating to competing platforms (Thomson Reuters, Wolters Kluwer) or to new AI-driven free tools reducing willingness to pay.
- Aggressive competitor pricing (Thomson Reuters, Wolters Kluwer) or new entrants bundling analytics for free/low-cost could force price cuts.
- A sudden need to fund large acquisitions or a sustained step-up in working capital or capex that reduces distributable cash.
- Sustained large buybacks or dividend payments without offsetting cash generation, or large acquisitions funded by debt that materially increase liabilities and interest burden.
- Structural changes in academic publishing (open access) or free AI data sources that reduce willingness to pay for data/content.
RELX news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
RELX income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
RELX: quick answers
- Have members of Congress traded RELX?
- 7 trades in RELX have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed RELX trade
