Park National
PRKNYSE AmericanUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- $179.82 Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- $176.11–$178.86 Regular-session low and high so far today.
- 75.8K Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
- Jan 25 projected Projected for 2027-01-25 from the company’s own results filings (SEC 8-K Item 2.02). The company has not confirmed the date.
- $149.06–$215.00 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own PRK if Park National (PRK) generates durable value by leveraging a stable, branch-centric community banking franchise and an employee-owner culture to retain deposits, price loans above funding costs, keep credit losses contained, and convert that spread.
PRK price history
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
Park’s local branch/deposit franchise and high employee ownership enable stable deposit funding and customer relationships so rising market loan yields convert into expanding revenue (net interest income) rather than being lost to deposit flight or wholesale funding.StrengtheningMateriality: High
Revenue increased from $465,747,000 (FY2023) to $520,607,000 (FY2024) to $557,192,000 (FY2025) (fundamentals). If true, Park captures rate tailwinds and funds loan growth with low-cost deposits, driving revenue and earnings; if false, funding costs rise and NII fails to expand.
Watch: Large deposit outflows to fintechs or national banks (digital deposit capture) that force Park to pay materially higher deposit rates.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Revenue increased from $465,747,000 (FY2023) to $520,607,000 (FY2024) to $557,192,000 (FY2025) (fundamentals).
Open source ↗Park’s conservative underwriting and provisioning discipline will keep credit costs contained so higher loan volumes translate into net income rather than being offset by rising provisions.HoldingMateriality: High
Net income rose steadily from $126,734,000 (FY2023) to $151,420,000 (FY2024) to $180,073,000 (FY2025) (fundamentals). Low, stable provisions protect EPS and ROE while allowing internal capital generation; if credit quality weakens, provisions will erode earnings and capital return capacity.
Watch: A concentrated CRE or commercial borrower impairment (either from legacy Vision Bank relationships or new portfolio stress) that forces materially higher provisions.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Net income rose steadily from $126,734,000 (FY2023) to $151,420,000 (FY2024) to $180,073,000 (FY2025) (fundamentals).
Open source ↗Disciplined expense management converts top‑line growth into rising operating cash flow, providing funding for LTIP/KSOP, buybacks and dividends without heavy external capital.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
Operating cash flow increased from $151,137,000 (FY2023) to $178,848,000 (FY2024) to $198,320,000 (FY2025) (fundamentals). If operating cash flow continues to grow with revenue, Park can fund shareholder returns and incentives without risking capital; if expenses rise faster than revenue, internal funding and EPS will suffer.
Watch: Sustained increases in personnel, technology or regulatory compliance costs (or large M&A integration costs) that push other expense materially higher.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Operating cash flow increased from $151,137,000 (FY2023) to $178,848,000 (FY2024) to $198,320,000 (FY2025) (fundamentals).
Open source ↗High employee ownership, long associate tenure and a branch footprint create a sticky customer/relationship moat that helps retain customers and sustain assets under management.HoldingMateriality: Medium
Park operated 87 financial service offices and reports 89% of associates were shareholders through the KSOP at year-end 2025 (Item 1 Business). A durable relationship moat reduces customer churn and supports cross‑sell and deposit stability; loss of that moat would accelerate deposit erosion and margin pressure.
Watch: Demographic or behavioral shifts away from branches (persistent digital adoption) that materially reduce branch deposit share.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Park operated 87 financial service offices and reports 89% of associates were shareholders through the KSOP at year-end 2025 (Item.
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
Park’s local branch/deposit franchise and high employee ownership enable stable deposit funding and customer relationships so rising market loan yields convert into expanding revenue (net interest income) rather than being lost to deposit flight or wholesale funding. If true, Park captures rate tailwinds and funds loan growth with low-cost deposits, driving revenue and earnings; if false, funding costs rise and NII fails to expand.
Park’s conservative underwriting and provisioning discipline will keep credit costs contained so higher loan volumes translate into net income rather than being offset by rising provisions. Low, stable provisions protect EPS and ROE while allowing internal capital generation; if credit quality weakens, provisions will erode earnings and capital return capacity.
Disciplined expense management converts top‑line growth into rising operating cash flow, providing funding for LTIP/KSOP, buybacks and dividends without heavy external capital. If operating cash flow continues to grow with revenue, Park can fund shareholder returns and incentives without risking capital; if expenses rise faster than revenue, internal funding and EPS will suffer.
High employee ownership, long associate tenure and a branch footprint create a sticky customer/relationship moat that helps retain customers and sustain assets under management. A durable relationship moat reduces customer churn and supports cross‑sell and deposit stability; loss of that moat would accelerate deposit erosion and margin pressure.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
Park National (PRK) generates durable value by leveraging a stable, branch-centric community banking franchise and an employee-owner culture to retain deposits, price loans above funding costs, keep credit losses contained, and convert that spread.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for Park National
Where the evidence on Park National stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 11, 2026). Of its 4 thesis points, 2 strengthening and 2 holding.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
Park’s local branch/deposit franchise and high employee ownership enable stable deposit funding and customer relationships so rising market loan yields convert into expanding revenue (net interest income) rather than being lost to deposit flight or wholesale funding.
Park’s conservative underwriting and provisioning discipline will keep credit costs contained so higher loan volumes translate into net income rather than being offset by rising provisions.
Disciplined expense management converts top‑line growth into rising operating cash flow, providing funding for LTIP/KSOP, buybacks and dividends without heavy external capital.
High employee ownership, long associate tenure and a branch footprint create a sticky customer/relationship moat that helps retain customers and sustain assets under management.
Bear case: what would count against it
Large deposit outflows to fintechs or national banks (digital deposit capture) that force Park to pay materially higher deposit rates.
A concentrated CRE or commercial borrower impairment (either from legacy Vision Bank relationships or new portfolio stress) that forces materially higher provisions.
Sustained increases in personnel, technology or regulatory compliance costs (or large M&A integration costs) that push other expense materially higher.
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · Park National
No break has crossed Park National’s thesis. Its break conditions are checked against every new filing as it lands.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
- MixedRegulation FD disclosure.
Park National filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-11-03: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedReported results of operations (earnings release).
Park National filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-26: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedRegulation FD disclosure.
Park National filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-08-07: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- Large deposit outflows to fintechs or national banks (digital deposit capture) that force Park to pay materially higher deposit rates.
- A concentrated CRE or commercial borrower impairment (either from legacy Vision Bank relationships or new portfolio stress) that forces materially higher provisions.
- Sustained increases in personnel, technology or regulatory compliance costs (or large M&A integration costs) that push other expense materially higher.
- Demographic or behavioral shifts away from branches (persistent digital adoption) that materially reduce branch deposit share.
PRK news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
PRK income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
PRK: quick answers
- When does Park National (PRK) report earnings next?
- Park National's next results are projected for January 25, 2027, from the dates of its own results filings with the SEC. The company has not confirmed the date. It last reported on October 26, 2026. Earnings calendar
- What is PRK's short interest?
- As of October 30, 2026, 769,408 PRK shares were sold short, 4.26% of its shares outstanding, down 2.3% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 7.6 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. PRK short interest history
- Have members of Congress traded PRK?
- 2 trades in PRK have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed PRK trade
