PJT Partners

PJTNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the PJT thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$152.94
−$1.57 (−1.02%)Today 1M +12.55%
After hours$152.940.00%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$154.51
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$152.45–$155.51
Regular-session low and high so far today.
194.6K
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Feb 2 projected
Projected for 2027-02-02 from the company’s own results filings (SEC 8-K Item 2.02). The company has not confirmed the date.
$127.73–$195.62
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own PJT if PJT is an asset-light, advisory-only investment bank whose value depends on whether its senior-banker franchise can keep winning high-fee strategic, restructuring, and private-capital mandates without giving the economics back through compensation.

PJT price history

Latest price$152.94Today−$1.57 (-1.02%)
PJT +10.47%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

4 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • PJT’s independent, senior-led advisory model continues to win high-value mandates from boards, sponsors, and creditors because clients prize conflict-light advice over bundled financing relationships.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    Annual GAAP revenue increased from $1.153 billion in FY2023 to $1.493 billion in FY2024 and $1.714 billion in FY2025. If this holds, revenue growth can reflect share gains rather than just a favorable deal cycle; if it breaks, PJT becomes much more exposed to cyclical advisory volume.

    Watch: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, or Bank of America win major strategic advisory mandates because clients prioritize financing, capital markets distribution, or lending balance sheet over independent advice.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Annual GAAP revenue increased from $1.153 billion in FY2023 to $1.493 billion in FY2024 and $1.714 billion in FY2025.

    Open source ↗
  • PJT’s restructuring and special-situations capability can offset some weakness in ordinary M&A cycles because credit stress creates advisory demand even when deal markets are soft.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    Annual GAAP operating cash flow remained positive in every provided year from FY2020 through FY2025. A countercyclical restructuring engine would make PJT’s earnings stream more durable than a pure M&A boutique; without it, the company is more exposed to transaction-cycle downturns.

    Watch: Credit markets reopen enough that leveraged borrowers refinance rather than restructure, reducing demand for creditor and debtor advisory mandates.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Annual GAAP operating cash flow remained positive in every provided year from FY2020 through FY2025.

    Open source ↗
  • The franchise retains enough pricing power over scarce senior advisory talent that fee growth is not fully competed away through compensation guarantees and hiring costs.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    Annual GAAP net income rose from $81.8 million in FY2023 to $134.4 million in FY2024 and $180.1 million in FY2025. For owners, the difference between a valuable advisory franchise and a collection of expensive rainmakers is whether incremental fees become GAAP earnings rather than employee compensation.

    Watch: A hiring war among Evercore, Lazard, Moelis, Houlihan Lokey, and bulge-bracket banks forces PJT to use larger guarantees that transfer economics from shareholders to bankers.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Annual GAAP net income rose from $81.8 million in FY2023 to $134.4 million in FY2024 and $180.1 million in FY2025.

    Open source ↗
  • PJT’s advisory-focused model remains capital-light, allowing the company to convert fees into cash without relying on a lending balance sheet or large principal-risk commitments.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    Cash and cash equivalents increased from $173.2 million at FY2022 year-end to $355.5 million at FY2023 year-end, $483.9 million at FY2024 year-end, and $538.9 million at FY2025 year-end. If the model stays capital-light, owners can benefit from cash generation through dividends, buybacks, hiring capacity, or balance-sheet resilience; if it becomes capital-heavy, returns and risk profile deteriorate.

    Watch: PJT expands into principal investing, underwriting, lending, or balance-sheet commitments that require more capital and introduce credit or market risk.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Cash and cash equivalents increased from $173.2 million at FY2022 year-end to $355.5 million at FY2023 year-end, $483.9 million at.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

PJT’s independent, senior-led advisory model continues to win high-value mandates from boards, sponsors, and creditors because clients prize conflict-light advice over bundled financing relationships. If this holds, revenue growth can reflect share gains rather than just a favorable deal cycle; if it breaks, PJT becomes much more exposed to cyclical advisory volume.

PJT’s restructuring and special-situations capability can offset some weakness in ordinary M&A cycles because credit stress creates advisory demand even when deal markets are soft. A countercyclical restructuring engine would make PJT’s earnings stream more durable than a pure M&A boutique; without it, the company is more exposed to transaction-cycle downturns.

The franchise retains enough pricing power over scarce senior advisory talent that fee growth is not fully competed away through compensation guarantees and hiring costs. For owners, the difference between a valuable advisory franchise and a collection of expensive rainmakers is whether incremental fees become GAAP earnings rather than employee compensation.

PJT’s advisory-focused model remains capital-light, allowing the company to convert fees into cash without relying on a lending balance sheet or large principal-risk commitments. If the model stays capital-light, owners can benefit from cash generation through dividends, buybacks, hiring capacity, or balance-sheet resilience; if it becomes capital-heavy, returns and risk profile deteriorate.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

PJT is an asset-light, advisory-only investment bank whose value depends on whether its senior-banker franchise can keep winning high-fee strategic, restructuring, and private-capital mandates without giving the economics back through compensation.

Evidence assessed Oct 19, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for PJT Partners

Where the evidence on PJT Partners stands: Strengthening on the latest evidence (Oct 19, 2026). Of its 4 thesis points, 4 strengthening.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • PJT’s independent, senior-led advisory model continues to win high-value mandates from boards, sponsors, and creditors because clients prize conflict-light advice over bundled financing relationships.

    sec.gov ↗

  • PJT’s restructuring and special-situations capability can offset some weakness in ordinary M&A cycles because credit stress creates advisory demand even when deal markets are soft.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The franchise retains enough pricing power over scarce senior advisory talent that fee growth is not fully competed away through compensation guarantees and hiring costs.

    sec.gov ↗

  • PJT’s advisory-focused model remains capital-light, allowing the company to convert fees into cash without relying on a lending balance sheet or large principal-risk commitments.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, or Bank of America win major strategic advisory mandates because clients prioritize financing, capital markets distribution, or lending balance sheet over independent advice.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Credit markets reopen enough that leveraged borrowers refinance rather than restructure, reducing demand for creditor and debtor advisory mandates.

    sec.gov ↗

  • A hiring war among Evercore, Lazard, Moelis, Houlihan Lokey, and bulge-bracket banks forces PJT to use larger guarantees that transfer economics from shareholders to bankers.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · PJT Partners

No break has crossed PJT Partners’s thesis. Its break conditions are checked against every new filing as it lands.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    PJT Partners filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-07-28: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Director or principal officer change.

    PJT Partners filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-07-16: Director or principal officer change. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    PJT Partners filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-04-28: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, or Bank of America win major strategic advisory mandates because clients prioritize financing, capital markets distribution, or lending balance sheet over independent advice.
  • Credit markets reopen enough that leveraged borrowers refinance rather than restructure, reducing demand for creditor and debtor advisory mandates.
  • A hiring war among Evercore, Lazard, Moelis, Houlihan Lokey, and bulge-bracket banks forces PJT to use larger guarantees that transfer economics from shareholders to bankers.
  • PJT expands into principal investing, underwriting, lending, or balance-sheet commitments that require more capital and introduce credit or market risk.

PJT news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

PJT income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

PJT: quick answers

When does PJT Partners (PJT) report earnings next?
PJT Partners's next results are projected for February 2, 2027, from the dates of its own results filings with the SEC. The company has not confirmed the date. It last reported on November 3, 2026. Earnings calendar
What is PJT's short interest?
As of October 30, 2026, 1.8M PJT shares were sold short, 7.19% of its shares outstanding, down 8.5% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 4.1 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. PJT short interest history
ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.