Oxbridge Re Holdings

OXBRNASDAQUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the OXBR thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$0.91
−$0.03 (−3.19%)Today 1M −7.84%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$0.94
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$0.91–$0.96
Regular-session low and high so far today.
7.0K
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Not yet confirmed
The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
$0.65–$1.86
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own OXBR if Oxbridge Re is a small Cayman specialty P&C reinsurer whose value depends on disciplined underwriting, access to external capital/retrocession, and management converting recent premium growth into sustainable underwriting profits and positive operating cash flow.

OXBR price history

Latest price$0.91Today−$0.03 (-3.19%)
OXBR -1.19%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

5 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • Oxbridge’s ability to continue writing reinsurance and scale profitable business is constrained by its dwindling cash — without timely external capital or retrocession it must curtail underwriting capacity.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    Cash fell from $2,135,000 (period_end 2024) to $268,000 (period_end 2025). If true, the firm can sustain or grow premiums and eventually profit; if false (no capital access), underwriting will be curtailed, revenue will stall and equity holders face dilution or run-off.

    Watch: A large, immediate capital raise (equity or subordinated debt) or placement of retrocession capacity that replenishes cash and underwriting capital.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Cash fell from $2,135,000 (period_end 2024) to $268,000 (period_end 2025).

    Open source ↗
  • The company showed a material increase in reported revenue in 2025, demonstrating the ability to scale written business in the short term, but it is unproven that this revenue growth will convert into sustainable underwriting profit.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    Reported revenue rose from $546,000 in 2024 to $2,577,000 in 2025, a significant year-over-year increase. Revenue growth without underwriting discipline only increases loss exposure and capital drain; sustained value requires converting growth into net_income and positive cash flow.

    Watch: If the revenue increase is driven by one-off investment gains, accounting shifts, or non-renewable treaty gains rather than repeatable premium, the growth will not persist.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Reported revenue rose from $546,000 in 2024 to $2,577,000 in 2025, a significant year-over-year increase.

    Open source ↗
  • Net losses have materially narrowed from 2023 to 2025, implying progress on loss experience or cost base, but durable value requires that net_income turn persistently positive as underwriting and expense discipline continue.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    net_income improved from -$9,910,000 (2023) to -$2,750,000 (2024) to -$2,080,000 (2025), showing a multi-year improvement trend. A sustained move to positive net_income would justify reinvesting capital and support per-share value; failure leaves shareholders exposed to recurring losses and capital erosion.

    Watch: A major catastrophe loss or adverse reserve development would reverse the improvement and widen net losses again.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    net_income improved from -$9,910,000 (2023) to -$2,750,000 (2024) to -$2,080,000 (2025), showing a multi-year improvement trend.

    Open source ↗
  • Oxbridge’s equity has materially declined since earlier years, so preserving regulatory and economic capital is central; continued equity erosion would constrain growth or force dilutive capital raises.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    StockholdersEquity moved from $16,651,000 (period_end 2021) to $5,916,000 (period_end 2025), a substantial decline. If equity stabilizes, the company can deploy capital to write profitable business; if equity continues to erode, owners face dilution or loss of underwriting capability.

    Watch: A successful non-dilutive capital solution (e.g., strategic partner or retrocession) that restores underwriting capacity and capital adequacy.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    StockholdersEquity moved from $16,651,000 (period_end 2021) to $5,916,000 (period_end 2025), a substantial decline.

    Open source ↗
  • The sizable fall in Assets since 2021 suggests management has been shrinking or restructuring the balance sheet; the business’s future value depends on whether shrinkage is a disciplined run-off (reducing risk) or enforced (loss of capital/clients).HoldingMateriality: Medium

    Assets declined from $17,689,000 (period_end 2021) to $8,053,000 (period_end 2025), a material reduction. A deliberate run-off that reduces risk could preserve residual value for shareholders; an enforced shrinkage due to capital pressure risks liquidation-style outcomes or heavy dilution.

    Watch: A planned strategic sale of assets or business units accompanied by reinvestment into more profitable lines would make shrinkage positive.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Assets declined from $17,689,000 (period_end 2021) to $8,053,000 (period_end 2025), a material reduction.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

Oxbridge’s ability to continue writing reinsurance and scale profitable business is constrained by its dwindling cash — without timely external capital or retrocession it must curtail underwriting capacity. If true, the firm can sustain or grow premiums and eventually profit; if false (no capital access), underwriting will be curtailed, revenue will stall and equity holders face dilution or run-off.

The company showed a material increase in reported revenue in 2025, demonstrating the ability to scale written business in the short term, but it is unproven that this revenue growth will convert into sustainable underwriting profit. Revenue growth without underwriting discipline only increases loss exposure and capital drain; sustained value requires converting growth into net_income and positive cash flow.

Net losses have materially narrowed from 2023 to 2025, implying progress on loss experience or cost base, but durable value requires that net_income turn persistently positive as underwriting and expense discipline continue. A sustained move to positive net_income would justify reinvesting capital and support per-share value; failure leaves shareholders exposed to recurring losses and capital erosion.

Oxbridge’s equity has materially declined since earlier years, so preserving regulatory and economic capital is central; continued equity erosion would constrain growth or force dilutive capital raises. If equity stabilizes, the company can deploy capital to write profitable business; if equity continues to erode, owners face dilution or loss of underwriting capability.

The sizable fall in Assets since 2021 suggests management has been shrinking or restructuring the balance sheet; the business’s future value depends on whether shrinkage is a disciplined run-off (reducing risk) or enforced (loss of capital/clients). A deliberate run-off that reduces risk could preserve residual value for shareholders; an enforced shrinkage due to capital pressure risks liquidation-style outcomes or heavy dilution.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

Oxbridge Re is a small Cayman specialty P&C reinsurer whose value depends on disciplined underwriting, access to external capital/retrocession, and management converting recent premium growth into sustainable underwriting profits and positive operating cash flow.

Evidence assessed Nov 7, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS

Where the evidence on OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 7, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 4 strengthening and 1 holding.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • Oxbridge’s ability to continue writing reinsurance and scale profitable business is constrained by its dwindling cash — without timely external capital or retrocession it must curtail underwriting capacity.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The company showed a material increase in reported revenue in 2025, demonstrating the ability to scale written business in the short term, but it is unproven that this revenue growth will convert into sustainable underwriting profit.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Net losses have materially narrowed from 2023 to 2025, implying progress on loss experience or cost base, but durable value requires that net_income turn persistently positive as underwriting and expense discipline continue.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Oxbridge’s equity has materially declined since earlier years, so preserving regulatory and economic capital is central; continued equity erosion would constrain growth or force dilutive capital raises.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The sizable fall in Assets since 2021 suggests management has been shrinking or restructuring the balance sheet; the business’s future value depends on whether shrinkage is a disciplined run-off (reducing risk) or enforced (loss of capital/clients).

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • A large, immediate capital raise (equity or subordinated debt) or placement of retrocession capacity that replenishes cash and underwriting capital.

    sec.gov ↗

  • If the revenue increase is driven by one-off investment gains, accounting shifts, or non-renewable treaty gains rather than repeatable premium, the growth will not persist.

    sec.gov ↗

  • A major catastrophe loss or adverse reserve development would reverse the improvement and widen net losses again.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS

Loading the break-condition record for OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-08-13: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Entered a material definitive agreement.

    OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-06-22: Entered a material definitive agreement. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    OXBRIDGE RE HOLDINGS filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-05-11: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • A large, immediate capital raise (equity or subordinated debt) or placement of retrocession capacity that replenishes cash and underwriting capital.
  • If the revenue increase is driven by one-off investment gains, accounting shifts, or non-renewable treaty gains rather than repeatable premium, the growth will not persist.
  • A major catastrophe loss or adverse reserve development would reverse the improvement and widen net losses again.
  • A successful non-dilutive capital solution (e.g., strategic partner or retrocession) that restores underwriting capacity and capital adequacy.
  • A planned strategic sale of assets or business units accompanied by reinvestment into more profitable lines would make shrinkage positive.

OXBR news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

OXBR income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

OXBR: quick answers

Have members of Congress traded OXBR?
2 trades in OXBR have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed OXBR trade
ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.