Northern Oil and Gas

NOGNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the NOG thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$24.32
+$0.91 (+3.89%)Today 1M −5.45%
After hours$23.19−4.65%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$23.41
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$23.33–$24.32
Regular-session low and high so far today.
1.6M
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Feb 24 projected
Projected for 2027-02-24 from the company’s own results filings (SEC 8-K Item 2.02). The company has not confirmed the date.
$17.18–$31.17
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own NOG if Northern Oil & Gas compounds value by buying diversified non-operated working and mineral interests in premier U.S. basins, generating predictable operating cash flow through scale, hedging and low per-well capital commitments, then returning excess.

NOG price history

Latest price$24.32Today+$0.91 (+3.89%)
NOG -3.82%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

4 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • NOG's non-operator, diversified-basin model plus a systematic hedging program causes operating cash flow to remain resilient even if GAAP earnings swing from impairments or mark-to-market items.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    Operating cash flow grew from $1.183B (2023) to $1.408B (2024) and $1.505B (2025), showing resilience despite GAAP volatility. If cash flows stay stable, management can sustain dividends, buybacks and accretive acquisitions; if they don't, distributions and growth will be at risk.

    Watch: Hedge program rolls off or is reduced such that realized prices fall materially below historical levels (commodity price shock without hedge coverage).

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Operating cash flow grew from $1.183B (2023) to $1.408B (2024) and $1.505B (2025), showing resilience despite GAAP volatility.

    Open source ↗
  • Growth via accretive purchases of non-operated interests will continue to drive production and revenue because the company can buy many small positions that expand near-term drilling opportunity exposure without taking operator risk.HoldingMateriality: High

    Management states acquisitions were a significant driver of 2024–2025 growth. Sustained, accretive acquisitions underpin future production, reserve replacement, and the cash that funds dividends/buybacks; if acquisitions become uneconomic, growth and distributions slow.

    Watch: Competitive bidding drives up prices for non-op acreage so future purchases are not accretive at expected commodity price levels.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Management states acquisitions were a significant driver of 2024–2025 growth.

    Open source ↗
  • Under full-cost accounting, a sustained drop in commodity prices or a material downward revision of proved reserves will trigger ceiling-test impairments that materially reduce GAAP net income and reported equity, independent of operating cash flow.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    MD&A: company recorded a non-cash ceiling-test impairment charge of $702.7M in 2025. Recurring impairments can wipe out GAAP earnings and book equity, undermine investor confidence, and force changes to dividends or capital allocation despite healthy cash generation.

    Watch: Hedging or higher realized commodity prices that increase the PV of future net revenues and avert future impairments.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    MD&A: company recorded a non-cash ceiling-test impairment charge of $702.7M in 2025.

    Open source ↗
  • Management's explicit leverage target (≈1.0x Debt/Adjusted EBITDA) constrains capital allocation: to sustain dividends and buybacks they must keep leverage near target, which limits the pace and price of acquisitions if cash flow or EBITDA weaken.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    Item 1: company states long-term goal of maintaining leverage at or near 1.0x Debt/Adjusted EBITDA. If they preserve the leverage target, shareholder returns are less likely to be cut for balance-sheet reasons; if leverage drifts higher, distributions or deal activity will need to be curtailed.

    Watch: Aggressive, debt-funded acquisitions or sustained commodity-price weakness that reduce Adjusted EBITDA and push leverage materially above 1.0x.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Item 1: company states long-term goal of maintaining leverage at or near 1.0x Debt/Adjusted EBITDA.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

NOG's non-operator, diversified-basin model plus a systematic hedging program causes operating cash flow to remain resilient even if GAAP earnings swing from impairments or mark-to-market items. If cash flows stay stable, management can sustain dividends, buybacks and accretive acquisitions; if they don't, distributions and growth will be at risk.

Growth via accretive purchases of non-operated interests will continue to drive production and revenue because the company can buy many small positions that expand near-term drilling opportunity exposure without taking operator risk. Sustained, accretive acquisitions underpin future production, reserve replacement, and the cash that funds dividends/buybacks; if acquisitions become uneconomic, growth and distributions slow.

Under full-cost accounting, a sustained drop in commodity prices or a material downward revision of proved reserves will trigger ceiling-test impairments that materially reduce GAAP net income and reported equity, independent of operating cash flow. Recurring impairments can wipe out GAAP earnings and book equity, undermine investor confidence, and force changes to dividends or capital allocation despite healthy cash generation.

Management's explicit leverage target (≈1.0x Debt/Adjusted EBITDA) constrains capital allocation: to sustain dividends and buybacks they must keep leverage near target, which limits the pace and price of acquisitions if cash flow or EBITDA weaken. If they preserve the leverage target, shareholder returns are less likely to be cut for balance-sheet reasons; if leverage drifts higher, distributions or deal activity will need to be curtailed.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

Northern Oil & Gas compounds value by buying diversified non-operated working and mineral interests in premier U.S. basins, generating predictable operating cash flow through scale, hedging and low per-well capital commitments, then returning excess.

Evidence assessed Nov 7, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for Northern Oil & Gas

Where the evidence on Northern Oil & Gas stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 7, 2026). Of its 4 thesis points, 2 strengthening and 2 holding.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • NOG's non-operator, diversified-basin model plus a systematic hedging program causes operating cash flow to remain resilient even if GAAP earnings swing from impairments or mark-to-market items.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Growth via accretive purchases of non-operated interests will continue to drive production and revenue because the company can buy many small positions that expand near-term drilling opportunity exposure without taking operator risk.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Under full-cost accounting, a sustained drop in commodity prices or a material downward revision of proved reserves will trigger ceiling-test impairments that materially reduce GAAP net income and reported equity, independent of operating cash flow.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Management's explicit leverage target (≈1.0x Debt/Adjusted EBITDA) constrains capital allocation: to sustain dividends and buybacks they must keep leverage near target, which limits the pace and price of acquisitions if cash flow or EBITDA weaken.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • Hedge program rolls off or is reduced such that realized prices fall materially below historical levels (commodity price shock without hedge coverage).

    sec.gov ↗

  • Competitive bidding drives up prices for non-op acreage so future purchases are not accretive at expected commodity price levels.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Hedging or higher realized commodity prices that increase the PV of future net revenues and avert future impairments.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · Northern Oil & Gas

12 mo agonow
Trailing daily price. No thesis break has crossed here, so there is no break base rate to project.

No break has crossed Northern Oil & Gas’s thesis. Its break conditions are checked against every new filing as it lands.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    Northern Oil & Gas filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-11-05: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    Northern Oil & Gas filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-13: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Entered a material definitive agreement.

    Northern Oil & Gas filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-08-26: Entered a material definitive agreement. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • Hedge program rolls off or is reduced such that realized prices fall materially below historical levels (commodity price shock without hedge coverage).
  • Competitive bidding drives up prices for non-op acreage so future purchases are not accretive at expected commodity price levels.
  • Hedging or higher realized commodity prices that increase the PV of future net revenues and avert future impairments.
  • Aggressive, debt-funded acquisitions or sustained commodity-price weakness that reduce Adjusted EBITDA and push leverage materially above 1.0x.

NOG news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

NOG income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

NOG: quick answers

When does Northern Oil & Gas (NOG) report earnings next?
Northern Oil & Gas's next results are projected for February 24, 2027, from the dates of its own results filings with the SEC. The company has not confirmed the date. It last reported on November 5, 2026. Earnings calendar
What is NOG's short interest?
As of October 30, 2026, 19.8M NOG shares were sold short, 18.7% of its shares outstanding, down 2.8% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 13 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. NOG short interest history
Have members of Congress traded NOG?
Reports made public in the last 90 days disclose 1 trade in NOG by 1 filer: 0 purchases and 1 sale. They are filed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President and senior officials. Every disclosed NOG trade
ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.