Medline
MDLNNASDAQUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- $40.91 Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- $40.55–$42.50 Regular-session low and high so far today.
- 8.3M Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
- Feb 3 projected Projected for 2027-02-03 from the company’s own results filings (SEC 8-K Item 2.02). The company has not confirmed the date.
- $31.37–$50.88 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own MDLN if Medline’s vertically integrated Prime Vendor model, large Medline Brand portfolio, and owned distribution network convert multi‑year customer contracts into recurring, higher‑margin med‑surg sales, allowing sustained cash generation and share gains across sites of care.
MDLN price history
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
Multi‑year Prime Vendor agreements convert customers into recurring, consolidated demand that drives above‑market revenue growth and reduces customer churn.StrengtheningMateriality: High
MD&A: >1,600 Prime Vendor relationships representing $18.0 billion of net sales (Item 7). If Prime Vendor rollout continues, revenue growth stays high and predictability of cash flows improves; if Prime Vendor adoption stalls or customers exit these agreements, revenue growth and retention will weaken.
Watch: Major IDNs or new entrants (e.g., large GPO alliances or e‑commerce/logistics providers) winning consolidated vendor roles from existing customers.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
MD&A: >1,600 Prime Vendor relationships representing $18.0 billion of net sales (Item 7).
Open source ↗Converting Supply Chain Solutions volumes to Medline Brand (private‑label) raises company gross profit and adjusted EBITDA because Medline Brand contributes disproportionately more EBITDA versus its share of sales.StrengtheningMateriality: High
MD&A: Medline Brand net sales $13.7B and Segment Adjusted EBITDA $3.3B (48.3% of sales but 80.6% of segment Adjusted EBITDA). Sustained conversion improves gross_profit and margin profile without needing equivalent topline growth; failure to convert leaves company margins capped by low‑margin Supply Chain Solutions sales.
Watch: Large suppliers or national brands push price promotions or GPOs force access terms that reduce private‑label economics.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
MD&A: Medline Brand net sales $13.7B and Segment Adjusted EBITDA $3.3B (48.3% of sales but 80.6% of segment Adjusted EBITDA).
Open source ↗Medline’s owned distribution network and fleet create a logistics advantage that lowers total delivered cost for customers and supports stable operating cash flow.HoldingMateriality: Medium
Operating cash flow consistent: $1,685,000,000 (2023) -> $1,769,000,000 (2024) -> $1,744,000,000 (2025) despite revenue growth. If logistics scale holds, Medline can protect price and service, keeping operating_cash_flow resilient; if distribution costs or fleet effectiveness degrade, cash conversion and service levels will suffer.
Watch: Significant logistics cost inflation (fuel, labor), regulatory constraints on fleet operations, or large-scale distribution interruptions.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Operating cash flow consistent: $1,685,000,000 (2023) -> $1,769,000,000 (2024) -> $1,744,000,000 (2025) despite revenue growth.
Open source ↗The Supply Chain Solutions segment’s lower margin profile limits company‑level operating_income unless Medline can convert a meaningful share of those volumes to Medline Brand.HoldingMateriality: Medium
MD&A: Supply Chain Solutions net sales $14.7B and Segment Adjusted EBITDA $0.8B (51.7% of sales but only 19.4% of segment Adjusted EBITDA). If conversion stalls, company operating_income and margins will be capped by the lower‑profit Supply Chain mix; successful conversion materially lifts operating_income and operating leverage.
Watch: Customers prefer to keep Supply Chain Solutions purchases as third‑party brands or regulatory/GPO rules inhibit substitution.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
MD&A: Supply Chain Solutions net sales $14.7B and Segment Adjusted EBITDA $0.8B (51.7% of sales but only 19.4% of segment.
Open source ↗Strong operating cash flow and a sharp increase in cash provide the balance‑sheet optionality to fund targeted M&A and investments that accelerate Brand penetration without diluting returns.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
Cash and equivalents rose from $199,000,000 (2024) to $1,939,000,000 (2025). If cash and operating_cash_flow remain healthy, Medline can use M&A to buy product portfolios, capabilities, or distribution hubs that accelerate conversion; if liquidity deteriorates, growth must come organically or via equity issuance, diluting returns.
Watch: Large, value‑destroying acquisitions or rapid capex increases that consume cash without improving margins.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Cash and equivalents rose from $199,000,000 (2024) to $1,939,000,000 (2025).
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
Multi‑year Prime Vendor agreements convert customers into recurring, consolidated demand that drives above‑market revenue growth and reduces customer churn. If Prime Vendor rollout continues, revenue growth stays high and predictability of cash flows improves; if Prime Vendor adoption stalls or customers exit these agreements, revenue growth and retention will weaken.
Converting Supply Chain Solutions volumes to Medline Brand (private‑label) raises company gross profit and adjusted EBITDA because Medline Brand contributes disproportionately more EBITDA versus its share of sales. Sustained conversion improves gross_profit and margin profile without needing equivalent topline growth; failure to convert leaves company margins capped by low‑margin Supply Chain Solutions sales.
Medline’s owned distribution network and fleet create a logistics advantage that lowers total delivered cost for customers and supports stable operating cash flow. If logistics scale holds, Medline can protect price and service, keeping operating_cash_flow resilient; if distribution costs or fleet effectiveness degrade, cash conversion and service levels will suffer.
The Supply Chain Solutions segment’s lower margin profile limits company‑level operating_income unless Medline can convert a meaningful share of those volumes to Medline Brand. If conversion stalls, company operating_income and margins will be capped by the lower‑profit Supply Chain mix; successful conversion materially lifts operating_income and operating leverage.
Strong operating cash flow and a sharp increase in cash provide the balance‑sheet optionality to fund targeted M&A and investments that accelerate Brand penetration without diluting returns. If cash and operating_cash_flow remain healthy, Medline can use M&A to buy product portfolios, capabilities, or distribution hubs that accelerate conversion; if liquidity deteriorates, growth must come organically or via equity issuance, diluting returns.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
Medline’s vertically integrated Prime Vendor model, large Medline Brand portfolio, and owned distribution network convert multi‑year customer contracts into recurring, higher‑margin med‑surg sales, allowing sustained cash generation and share gains across sites of care.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for Medline
Where the evidence on Medline stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 10, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 3 strengthening and 2 holding.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
Multi‑year Prime Vendor agreements convert customers into recurring, consolidated demand that drives above‑market revenue growth and reduces customer churn.
Converting Supply Chain Solutions volumes to Medline Brand (private‑label) raises company gross profit and adjusted EBITDA because Medline Brand contributes disproportionately more EBITDA versus its share of sales.
Medline’s owned distribution network and fleet create a logistics advantage that lowers total delivered cost for customers and supports stable operating cash flow.
The Supply Chain Solutions segment’s lower margin profile limits company‑level operating_income unless Medline can convert a meaningful share of those volumes to Medline Brand.
Strong operating cash flow and a sharp increase in cash provide the balance‑sheet optionality to fund targeted M&A and investments that accelerate Brand penetration without diluting returns.
Bear case: what would count against it
Major IDNs or new entrants (e.g., large GPO alliances or e‑commerce/logistics providers) winning consolidated vendor roles from existing customers.
Large suppliers or national brands push price promotions or GPOs force access terms that reduce private‑label economics.
Significant logistics cost inflation (fuel, labor), regulatory constraints on fleet operations, or large-scale distribution interruptions.
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · Medline
No break has crossed Medline’s thesis. Its break conditions are checked against every new filing as it lands.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
- MixedReported results of operations (earnings release).
Medline filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-11-04: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedRegulation FD disclosure.
Medline filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-21: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedDirector or principal officer change.
Medline filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-15: Director or principal officer change. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- Major IDNs or new entrants (e.g., large GPO alliances or e‑commerce/logistics providers) winning consolidated vendor roles from existing customers.
- Large suppliers or national brands push price promotions or GPOs force access terms that reduce private‑label economics.
- Significant logistics cost inflation (fuel, labor), regulatory constraints on fleet operations, or large-scale distribution interruptions.
- Customers prefer to keep Supply Chain Solutions purchases as third‑party brands or regulatory/GPO rules inhibit substitution.
- Large, value‑destroying acquisitions or rapid capex increases that consume cash without improving margins.
MDLN news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
MDLN income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
MDLN: quick answers
- When does Medline (MDLN) report earnings next?
- Medline's next results are projected for February 3, 2027, from the dates of its own results filings with the SEC. The company has not confirmed the date. It last reported on November 4, 2026. Earnings calendar
- What is MDLN's short interest?
- As of October 30, 2026, 37.8M MDLN shares were sold short, 4.31% of its shares outstanding, down 7.3% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 3.8 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. MDLN short interest history
- Which well-known investors own MDLN?
- 5 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported MDLN shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Lone Pine Capital (Stephen Mandel), 5.1%; Durable Capital Partners, 1.0%; Soros Fund Management (George Soros), 0.8%. Fund portfolios
MDLN in well-known investors’ portfolios
5 of 37 funds reported MDLN shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.
| Fund | Of its portfolio | Value | Change | Quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen MandelLone Pine Capital | 5.1% | $827M | +77.9% | Q2 2026 |
| Durable Capital Partners | 1.0% | $104M | −63.8% | Q2 2026 |
| George SorosSoros Fund Management | 0.79% | $64.6M | +27.4% | Q2 2026 |
| Andreas HalvorsenViking Global Investors | 0.54% | $191M | −57.7% | Q2 2026 |
| Ray DalioBridgewater Associates | 0.00% | $783K | New | Q2 2026 |
