lululemon athletica

LULUNASDAQUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the LULU thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$107.45
−$2.92 (−2.65%)Today 1M +16.79%
After hours$107.30−0.14%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$110.37
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$105.98–$109.13
Regular-session low and high so far today.
2.7M
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Dec 10 projected
Projected for 2026-12-10 from the company’s own results filings (SEC 8-K Item 2.02). The company has not confirmed the date.
$90.38–$225.98
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own LULU if Lululemon leverages rare brand, product engineering and an owned omni-channel retail footprint to earn premium pricing; its equity returns depend on proving that international expansion plus men's/accessories growth can offset North America softness and.

LULU price history

Latest price$107.45Today−$2.92 (-2.65%)
LULU +14.14%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

5 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • Lululemon’s brand and product differentiation will sustain above-industry gross margins because guests pay for technical fabrics, fit and the community/experience that reduce price elasticity versus mass-market apparel.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    MD&A: gross margin decreased 260 basis points to 56.6% in FY2025 (Item 7), but gross profit remained about $6.28B (gross_profit). If pricing power holds, gross margin supports operating income and cash flow even when unit growth is modest; if it breaks, sustained markdowns will destroy operating leverage and cash generation.

    Watch: Competitors (e.g., Nike, adidas and premium entrants) successfully replicate fabrics/pricing or engage in targeted discounting that commoditizes lululemon’s offerings.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    MD&A: gross margin decreased 260 basis points to 56.6% in FY2025 (Item 7), but gross profit remained about $6.28B (gross_profit).

    Open source ↗
  • International expansion (China and Rest of World) plus scaling men’s and accessories will be the primary levers to drive top-line growth because those markets have shown materially higher comps and are the focus of new store and marketing investment.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    FY2025 revenue was $11,102,600,000 (revenue), up 5% year-over-year. If international and men’s growth materialize, they can offset Americas weakness and produce sustainable revenue growth; if they fail to scale, overall revenue growth will slow and leverage will suffer.

    Watch: A Chinese consumer slowdown or local competitive win that slows comps in China Mainland.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    FY2025 revenue was $11,102,600,000 (revenue), up 5% year-over-year.

    Open source ↗
  • Investments in omni‑channel capabilities, faster speed-to-market and inventory chase will improve sell-through and reduce markdowns, converting into better operating cash flow and protecting operating income against cost shocks.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    FY2025 operating cash flow was $1,602,477,000 (operating_cash_flow). If inventory agility and omni-channel execution work, the company can partially offset tariff/COGS pressure via lower markdowns and better conversion; if execution fails, inventory risk will amplify margin declines.

    Watch: Material supply-chain disruption or fulfillment execution problems that prevent ship-from-store or chase replenishment, causing higher markdowns.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    FY2025 operating cash flow was $1,602,477,000 (operating_cash_flow).

    Open source ↗
  • U.S. import tariff increases and removal of the de minimis provision are a persistent structural headwind that will keep operating margins below pre-tariff levels unless policy is reversed or the company finds outsized vendor/supply cost savings.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    MD&A: operating margin fell 380 basis points to 19.9% in FY2025 and management says increased tariff rates and removal of de minimis adversely affected gross margin and income from operations and will continue to affect 2026 (Item 7). Tariffs directly raise COGS and compress gross and operating margins; if they persist without offset, the company cannot sustain prior operating leverage even with growth.

    Watch: Reversal or relief of the tariff/de minimis changes by U.S. policy makers.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    MD&A: operating margin fell 380 basis points to 19.9% in FY2025 and management says increased tariff rates and removal of.

    Open source ↗
  • Disciplined capital allocation — meaningful share repurchases funded by cash flow — can drive EPS growth even if top-line growth is only modest, because buybacks reduce share count and return cash to shareholders.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    EPS diluted was $13.26 in FY2025 (eps_diluted). Buybacks amplify EPS and total shareholder return when cash flow is strong; if cash flow weakens or buybacks stop, EPS and return expectations will fall materially.

    Watch: Operating cash flow weakens materially and management curtails buybacks to preserve liquidity.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    EPS diluted was $13.26 in FY2025 (eps_diluted).

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

Lululemon’s brand and product differentiation will sustain above-industry gross margins because guests pay for technical fabrics, fit and the community/experience that reduce price elasticity versus mass-market apparel. If pricing power holds, gross margin supports operating income and cash flow even when unit growth is modest; if it breaks, sustained markdowns will destroy operating leverage and cash generation.

International expansion (China and Rest of World) plus scaling men’s and accessories will be the primary levers to drive top-line growth because those markets have shown materially higher comps and are the focus of new store and marketing investment. If international and men’s growth materialize, they can offset Americas weakness and produce sustainable revenue growth; if they fail to scale, overall revenue growth will slow and leverage will suffer.

Investments in omni‑channel capabilities, faster speed-to-market and inventory chase will improve sell-through and reduce markdowns, converting into better operating cash flow and protecting operating income against cost shocks. If inventory agility and omni-channel execution work, the company can partially offset tariff/COGS pressure via lower markdowns and better conversion; if execution fails, inventory risk will amplify margin declines.

U.S. import tariff increases and removal of the de minimis provision are a persistent structural headwind that will keep operating margins below pre-tariff levels unless policy is reversed or the company finds outsized vendor/supply cost savings. Tariffs directly raise COGS and compress gross and operating margins; if they persist without offset, the company cannot sustain prior operating leverage even with growth.

Disciplined capital allocation — meaningful share repurchases funded by cash flow — can drive EPS growth even if top-line growth is only modest, because buybacks reduce share count and return cash to shareholders. Buybacks amplify EPS and total shareholder return when cash flow is strong; if cash flow weakens or buybacks stop, EPS and return expectations will fall materially.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

Lululemon leverages rare brand, product engineering and an owned omni-channel retail footprint to earn premium pricing; its equity returns depend on proving that international expansion plus men's/accessories growth can offset North America softness and.

Evidence assessed Nov 6, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for lululemon athletica

Where the evidence on lululemon athletica stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 6, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 3 strengthening and 2 holding.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • Lululemon’s brand and product differentiation will sustain above-industry gross margins because guests pay for technical fabrics, fit and the community/experience that reduce price elasticity versus mass-market apparel.

    sec.gov ↗

  • International expansion (China and Rest of World) plus scaling men’s and accessories will be the primary levers to drive top-line growth because those markets have shown materially higher comps and are the focus of new store and marketing investment.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Investments in omni‑channel capabilities, faster speed-to-market and inventory chase will improve sell-through and reduce markdowns, converting into better operating cash flow and protecting operating income against cost shocks.

    sec.gov ↗

  • U.S. import tariff increases and removal of the de minimis provision are a persistent structural headwind that will keep operating margins below pre-tariff levels unless policy is reversed or the company finds outsized vendor/supply cost savings.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Disciplined capital allocation — meaningful share repurchases funded by cash flow — can drive EPS growth even if top-line growth is only modest, because buybacks reduce share count and return cash to shareholders.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • Competitors (e.g., Nike, adidas and premium entrants) successfully replicate fabrics/pricing or engage in targeted discounting that commoditizes lululemon’s offerings.

    sec.gov ↗

  • A Chinese consumer slowdown or local competitive win that slows comps in China Mainland.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Material supply-chain disruption or fulfillment execution problems that prevent ship-from-store or chase replenishment, causing higher markdowns.

    sec.gov ↗

Company research

Research on lululemon athletica

Thesis-Break Engine

What has broken in lululemon athletica’s thesis

Each break OptimistFi flagged on lululemon athletica, dated — with what has historically followed the same kind of break across the market, not a forecast for lululemon athletica.

peers+15%-20%-2%12 mo agonow+6 mo
Daily price, then where similar breaks led across the market: the typical -2% path vs comparable companies over six months, inside the middle-half range (+15% to -20%). A base rate, not a forecast.
  • CEO / officer changecondition set before this filing

    Across all companies, this kind of break has happened 16,849 times before. Those stocks trailed comparable companies by a median of 2% over the next six months, and 38% of them trailed it by 10 points or more.

  • Price target fell below the stockcondition set before this filing

    Across all companies, this kind of break has happened 1,809 times before. Those stocks trailed comparable companies by a median of 1% over the next six months, and 33% of them trailed it by 10 points or more.

Several kinds of break have stacked on lululemon athletica at once. A cluster is a stronger read than any one signal alone.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against comparable companies after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

No assessed change was returned in this research window. That can reflect a quiet period or a coverage limit.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • Competitors (e.g., Nike, adidas and premium entrants) successfully replicate fabrics/pricing or engage in targeted discounting that commoditizes lululemon’s offerings.
  • A Chinese consumer slowdown or local competitive win that slows comps in China Mainland.
  • Material supply-chain disruption or fulfillment execution problems that prevent ship-from-store or chase replenishment, causing higher markdowns.
  • Reversal or relief of the tariff/de minimis changes by U.S. policy makers.
  • Operating cash flow weakens materially and management curtails buybacks to preserve liquidity.

LULU news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

LULU income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

LULU: quick answers

When does lululemon athletica (LULU) report earnings next?
lululemon athletica's next results are projected for December 10, 2026, from the dates of its own results filings with the SEC. The company has not confirmed the date. It last reported on September 3, 2026. Earnings calendar
What is LULU's short interest?
As of October 30, 2026, 13.9M LULU shares were sold short, 13.2% of its shares outstanding, down 14.3% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 3.8 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. LULU short interest history
Have members of Congress traded LULU?
Reports made public in the last 90 days disclose 5 trades in LULU by 1 filer: 1 purchase and 4 sales. They are filed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President and senior officials. Every disclosed LULU trade
Which well-known investors own LULU?
2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported LULU shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Fairfax Financial (Prem Watsa), 0.1%; Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio), 0.0%. Fund portfolios

LULU in well-known investors’ portfolios

2 of 37 funds reported LULU shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.

FundOf its portfolioValueChangeQuarter
Prem WatsaFairfax Financial0.05%$1.4MNo changeQ2 2026
Ray DalioBridgewater Associates0.01%$3.3M+420.7%Q2 2026

Every fund’s portfolio

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.