Ingram Micro Holding

INGMNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the INGM thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$28.00
+$0.56 (+2.04%)Today 1M −1.01%
After hours$29.08+3.86%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$27.44
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$27.61–$28.23
Regular-session low and high so far today.
1.7M
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Not yet confirmed
The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
$19.03–$31.69
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own INGM if its scale as a global IT-channel intermediary remains necessary to vendors and resellers and if management converts thin distribution economics into reliable cash flow.

INGM price history

Latest price$28.00Today+$0.56 (+2.04%)
INGM +1.76%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

5 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • Vendors and resellers continue to need Ingram Micro’s global channel scale rather than bypassing it through direct sales or marketplaces, so IT demand keeps flowing through the company instead of around it.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    FY2025 GAAP annual revenue was $52.6 billion, up from $48.0 billion in FY2024. If the intermediary role remains necessary, Ingram can keep compounding gross-profit dollars despite thin margins; if the channel bypasses it, the revenue base loses strategic value.

    Watch: Major technology vendors such as Dell, HP, Cisco, Microsoft, or hyperscale cloud providers shift a larger share of channel volume to direct marketplaces or direct enterprise sales.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    FY2025 GAAP annual revenue was $52.6 billion, up from $48.0 billion in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
  • Ingram’s value-added services, logistics, credit, and solution-aggregation role must remain important enough that vendors and customers allow it to preserve gross-profit dollars instead of treating distribution as a pure pass-through commodity.HoldingMateriality: High

    FY2025 GAAP annual gross profit was $3.50 billion, up modestly from $3.44 billion in FY2024. Revenue growth is only valuable if it carries enough gross profit to fund the operating platform and leave earnings for shareholders.

    Watch: Major vendors reduce rebates, marketing-development funds, or distributor incentives.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    FY2025 GAAP annual gross profit was $3.50 billion, up modestly from $3.44 billion in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
  • Management keeps operating costs scaled to the platform, so small gross-margin dollars in distribution still convert into meaningful operating income rather than being consumed by sales, logistics, technology, and compliance costs.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    FY2025 GAAP annual operating income was $876.9 million, up from $817.9 million in FY2024. Because distribution margins are thin, even modest operating-cost slippage can erase shareholder earnings.

    Watch: Labor, freight, systems, cybersecurity, or compliance costs rise faster than gross-profit dollars.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    FY2025 GAAP annual operating income was $876.9 million, up from $817.9 million in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
  • Ingram’s working-capital engine remains a competitive capability: inventory, receivables, vendor credit, and customer collections are managed tightly enough that growth produces cash rather than absorbing it.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    FY2025 GAAP annual operating cash flow was $916.1 million, up from $333.8 million in FY2024. For a distributor, accounting earnings are less valuable if inventory and receivables consume cash; sustained cash conversion supports debt capacity and shareholder value.

    Watch: A PC, server, or networking inventory correction leaves Ingram with excess stock or vendor price-protection disputes.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    FY2025 GAAP annual operating cash flow was $916.1 million, up from $333.8 million in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
  • The balance sheet remains capable of funding a large, low-margin distribution model without lenders or vendors capturing too much of the economics.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    FY2025 liabilities were $17.0 billion against $21.2 billion of assets, reflecting the large financing load inherent in the model. If financing capacity tightens, Ingram may have to shrink volume, accept worse terms, or sacrifice margin to preserve liquidity.

    Watch: Higher interest rates or refinancing pressure raise the cost of funding receivables and inventory.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    FY2025 liabilities were $17.0 billion against $21.2 billion of assets, reflecting the large financing load inherent in the model.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

Vendors and resellers continue to need Ingram Micro’s global channel scale rather than bypassing it through direct sales or marketplaces, so IT demand keeps flowing through the company instead of around it. If the intermediary role remains necessary, Ingram can keep compounding gross-profit dollars despite thin margins; if the channel bypasses it, the revenue base loses strategic value.

Ingram’s value-added services, logistics, credit, and solution-aggregation role must remain important enough that vendors and customers allow it to preserve gross-profit dollars instead of treating distribution as a pure pass-through commodity. Revenue growth is only valuable if it carries enough gross profit to fund the operating platform and leave earnings for shareholders.

Management keeps operating costs scaled to the platform, so small gross-margin dollars in distribution still convert into meaningful operating income rather than being consumed by sales, logistics, technology, and compliance costs. Because distribution margins are thin, even modest operating-cost slippage can erase shareholder earnings.

Ingram’s working-capital engine remains a competitive capability: inventory, receivables, vendor credit, and customer collections are managed tightly enough that growth produces cash rather than absorbing it. For a distributor, accounting earnings are less valuable if inventory and receivables consume cash; sustained cash conversion supports debt capacity and shareholder value.

The balance sheet remains capable of funding a large, low-margin distribution model without lenders or vendors capturing too much of the economics. If financing capacity tightens, Ingram may have to shrink volume, accept worse terms, or sacrifice margin to preserve liquidity.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

its scale as a global IT-channel intermediary remains necessary to vendors and resellers and if management converts thin distribution economics into reliable cash flow.

Evidence assessed Oct 14, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for Ingram Micro Holding

Where the evidence on Ingram Micro Holding stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Oct 14, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 2 strengthening and 3 holding.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • Vendors and resellers continue to need Ingram Micro’s global channel scale rather than bypassing it through direct sales or marketplaces, so IT demand keeps flowing through the company instead of around it.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Ingram’s value-added services, logistics, credit, and solution-aggregation role must remain important enough that vendors and customers allow it to preserve gross-profit dollars instead of treating distribution as a pure pass-through commodity.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Management keeps operating costs scaled to the platform, so small gross-margin dollars in distribution still convert into meaningful operating income rather than being consumed by sales, logistics, technology, and compliance costs.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Ingram’s working-capital engine remains a competitive capability: inventory, receivables, vendor credit, and customer collections are managed tightly enough that growth produces cash rather than absorbing it.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The balance sheet remains capable of funding a large, low-margin distribution model without lenders or vendors capturing too much of the economics.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • Major technology vendors such as Dell, HP, Cisco, Microsoft, or hyperscale cloud providers shift a larger share of channel volume to direct marketplaces or direct enterprise sales.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Major vendors reduce rebates, marketing-development funds, or distributor incentives.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Labor, freight, systems, cybersecurity, or compliance costs rise faster than gross-profit dollars.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · Ingram Micro Holding

Loading the break-condition record for Ingram Micro Holding.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Regulation FD disclosure.

    Ingram Micro Holding filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-15: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Entered a material definitive agreement.

    Ingram Micro Holding filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-10: Entered a material definitive agreement. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    Ingram Micro Holding filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-07-30: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • Major technology vendors such as Dell, HP, Cisco, Microsoft, or hyperscale cloud providers shift a larger share of channel volume to direct marketplaces or direct enterprise sales.
  • Major vendors reduce rebates, marketing-development funds, or distributor incentives.
  • Labor, freight, systems, cybersecurity, or compliance costs rise faster than gross-profit dollars.
  • A PC, server, or networking inventory correction leaves Ingram with excess stock or vendor price-protection disputes.
  • Higher interest rates or refinancing pressure raise the cost of funding receivables and inventory.

INGM news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

INGM income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

INGM: quick answers

What is INGM's short interest?
As of October 30, 2026, 6.2M INGM shares were sold short, 2.68% of its shares outstanding, down 17.1% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 3.9 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. INGM short interest history
Which well-known investors own INGM?
1 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported INGM shares in their latest 13F filing. By share of the fund's portfolio: Soros Fund Management (George Soros), 0.1%. Fund portfolios

INGM in well-known investors’ portfolios

1 of 37 funds reported INGM shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.

FundOf its portfolioValueChangeQuarter
George SorosSoros Fund Management0.07%$5.7M—Q2 2026

Every fund’s portfolio

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.