InterDigital
IDCCNASDAQUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- $292.52 Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- $292.28–$305.84 Regular-session low and high so far today.
- 204.6K Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
- Not yet confirmed The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
- $249.14–$387.30 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own IDCC if its wireless, video and AI-related R&D portfolio remains essential enough that major device and technology companies keep paying enforceable royalties rather than successfully resetting rates lower.
IDCC price history
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
InterDigital’s wireless and video patent portfolio remains important enough to device and technology companies that license renewals and new agreements keep converting standards adoption into royalty revenue.StrengtheningMateriality: High
GAAP annual revenue rose from $425.4 million in FY2021 to $834.0 million in FY2025. If the patents remain unavoidable, revenue can persist without owning manufacturing assets; if licensees can route around or defeat the portfolio, the revenue base can reset sharply lower.
Watch: Major handset or consumer-electronics OEMs such as Apple, Samsung, Xiaomi or other large Chinese manufacturers win broad invalidity, non-infringement or rate-reset rulings against InterDigital patents.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
GAAP annual revenue rose from $425.4 million in FY2021 to $834.0 million in FY2025.
Open source ↗The licensing model continues to show operating leverage because incremental royalty dollars require far less incremental cost than a hardware or services business.StrengtheningMateriality: High
GAAP annual operating income increased from $71.2 million in FY2021 to $460.9 million in FY2025. Operating leverage is what turns patent relevance into owner value; if legal, R&D or enforcement costs rise as fast as royalties, the business becomes less exceptional.
Watch: Patent enforcement becomes more expensive because key licensees push more disputes into multi-year litigation.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
GAAP annual operating income increased from $71.2 million in FY2021 to $460.9 million in FY2025.
Open source ↗License economics are being collected in cash, giving InterDigital the ability to fund R&D, enforcement and shareholder returns without relying on external capital.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
GAAP annual operating cash flow was $544.5 million in FY2025, above FY2025 GAAP net income of $406.6 million. Cash collection distinguishes durable royalty power from accounting revenue; weak collections would undermine both reinvestment capacity and valuation support.
Watch: Large licensees delay cash payments while challenging contract terms or patent validity.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
GAAP annual operating cash flow was $544.5 million in FY2025, above FY2025 GAAP net income of $406.6 million.
Open source ↗A large cash balance strengthens InterDigital’s bargaining position because it can endure long licensing disputes and continue investing through negotiation cycles.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
Cash was $739.0 million at FY2025 year-end, up from $527.4 million at FY2024 year-end. Patent licensors need staying power; if counterparties can outlast the company financially, royalty rates and settlements become weaker.
Watch: A major adverse litigation outcome consumes cash through damages, refunds, legal costs or unfavorable settlement terms.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Cash was $739.0 million at FY2025 year-end, up from $527.4 million at FY2024 year-end.
Open source ↗InterDigital’s push beyond core wireless into video, AI and related technologies must produce licenseable IP, because handset wireless royalties alone may not provide indefinite growth.HoldingMateriality: Medium
The company profile describes InterDigital as focused primarily on wireless, video, AI and related technologies. If new domains monetize, the royalty base can extend beyond mature phone cycles; if they do not, the company may be a cash-generative but lower-growth patent licensor.
Watch: Video codecs, AI infrastructure or edge-device technologies shift toward royalty-free or open-source implementations.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
The company profile describes InterDigital as focused primarily on wireless, video, AI and related technologies.
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
InterDigital’s wireless and video patent portfolio remains important enough to device and technology companies that license renewals and new agreements keep converting standards adoption into royalty revenue. If the patents remain unavoidable, revenue can persist without owning manufacturing assets; if licensees can route around or defeat the portfolio, the revenue base can reset sharply lower.
The licensing model continues to show operating leverage because incremental royalty dollars require far less incremental cost than a hardware or services business. Operating leverage is what turns patent relevance into owner value; if legal, R&D or enforcement costs rise as fast as royalties, the business becomes less exceptional.
License economics are being collected in cash, giving InterDigital the ability to fund R&D, enforcement and shareholder returns without relying on external capital. Cash collection distinguishes durable royalty power from accounting revenue; weak collections would undermine both reinvestment capacity and valuation support.
A large cash balance strengthens InterDigital’s bargaining position because it can endure long licensing disputes and continue investing through negotiation cycles. Patent licensors need staying power; if counterparties can outlast the company financially, royalty rates and settlements become weaker.
InterDigital’s push beyond core wireless into video, AI and related technologies must produce licenseable IP, because handset wireless royalties alone may not provide indefinite growth. If new domains monetize, the royalty base can extend beyond mature phone cycles; if they do not, the company may be a cash-generative but lower-growth patent licensor.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
its wireless, video and AI-related R&D portfolio remains essential enough that major device and technology companies keep paying enforceable royalties rather than successfully resetting rates lower.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for InterDigital
Where the evidence on InterDigital stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Oct 26, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 4 strengthening and 1 holding.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
InterDigital’s wireless and video patent portfolio remains important enough to device and technology companies that license renewals and new agreements keep converting standards adoption into royalty revenue.
The licensing model continues to show operating leverage because incremental royalty dollars require far less incremental cost than a hardware or services business.
License economics are being collected in cash, giving InterDigital the ability to fund R&D, enforcement and shareholder returns without relying on external capital.
A large cash balance strengthens InterDigital’s bargaining position because it can endure long licensing disputes and continue investing through negotiation cycles.
InterDigital’s push beyond core wireless into video, AI and related technologies must produce licenseable IP, because handset wireless royalties alone may not provide indefinite growth.
Bear case: what would count against it
Major handset or consumer-electronics OEMs such as Apple, Samsung, Xiaomi or other large Chinese manufacturers win broad invalidity, non-infringement or rate-reset rulings against InterDigital patents.
Patent enforcement becomes more expensive because key licensees push more disputes into multi-year litigation.
Large licensees delay cash payments while challenging contract terms or patent validity.
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · InterDigital
Loading the break-condition record for InterDigital.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
- MixedReported results of operations (earnings release).
InterDigital filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-07-30: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedReported results of operations (earnings release).
InterDigital filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-04-30: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- Major handset or consumer-electronics OEMs such as Apple, Samsung, Xiaomi or other large Chinese manufacturers win broad invalidity, non-infringement or rate-reset rulings against InterDigital patents.
- Patent enforcement becomes more expensive because key licensees push more disputes into multi-year litigation.
- Large licensees delay cash payments while challenging contract terms or patent validity.
- A major adverse litigation outcome consumes cash through damages, refunds, legal costs or unfavorable settlement terms.
- Video codecs, AI infrastructure or edge-device technologies shift toward royalty-free or open-source implementations.
IDCC news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
IDCC income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
IDCC: quick answers
- Which well-known investors own IDCC?
- 2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported IDCC shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Fundsmith (Terry Smith), 0.1%; Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio), 0.0%. Fund portfolios
IDCC in well-known investors’ portfolios
2 of 37 funds reported IDCC shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.
| Fund | Of its portfolio | Value | Change | Quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry SmithFundsmith | 0.13% | $17.1M | New | Q2 2026 |
| Ray DalioBridgewater Associates | 0.01% | $1.2M | New | Q2 2026 |
