Haemonetics

HAENYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the HAE thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$120.54
−$1.82 (−1.49%)Today 1M +3.09%
After hours$120.540.00%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$122.36
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$120.02–$123.06
Regular-session low and high so far today.
390.1K
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Not yet confirmed
The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
$51.00–$132.00
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own HAE if its mission-critical blood and hospital procedure platforms remain sticky enough to lift mix and cash flow despite near-term revenue softness.

HAE price history

Latest price$120.54Today−$1.82 (-1.49%)
HAE -0.11%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

5 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • Haemonetics’ role in quality- and efficiency-critical blood and plasma workflows should keep customer demand recurring, but that stickiness is under test after the FY2026 revenue decline.HoldingMateriality: High

    GAAP annual revenue was $1.334 billion in FY2026, still above $1.169 billion in FY2023. If workflow stickiness holds, revenue can stabilize and grow without constant reinvention; if customers can switch platforms easily, the business becomes a lower-quality equipment cycle.

    Watch: A major plasma-collection customer standardizes new centers on a competing platform from Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies, Fresenius Kabi, or Grifols.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual revenue was $1.334 billion in FY2026, still above $1.169 billion in FY2023.

    Open source ↗
  • Haemonetics’ higher-value procedure and consumables mix should protect pricing and expand gross profit even when headline revenue is uneven.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    GAAP annual gross profit increased to $787.6 million in FY2026 from $749.0 million in FY2025 and $691.5 million in FY2024. Gross-profit durability is the clearest sign that the business has pricing power or favorable mix rather than commodity-device economics.

    Watch: Hospital group purchasing organizations or plasma customers force price concessions that offset procedure-volume growth.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual gross profit increased to $787.6 million in FY2026 from $749.0 million in FY2025 and $691.5 million in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
  • The company’s operating model must convert higher gross profit into GAAP operating income; otherwise spending, integration, or compliance costs are absorbing the economic advantage.WeakeningMateriality: Medium

    GAAP annual operating income remained positive at $156.7 million in FY2026. Owners only benefit from mix improvement if it reaches operating profit rather than being consumed by restructuring, SG&A, R&D, or remediation costs.

    Watch: Product-quality, regulatory, or supply-chain issues require elevated spending and prevent operating leverage.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual operating income remained positive at $156.7 million in FY2026.

    Open source ↗
  • The recurring consumables and procedure-driven nature of the business should translate accounting earnings into strong operating cash flow, giving Haemonetics funding flexibility even when GAAP earnings are volatile.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    GAAP annual operating cash flow increased to $293.2 million in FY2026 from $181.7 million in FY2025. Cash conversion funds R&D, acquisitions, debt reduction, or buybacks; if it weakens, the company has less room to fix growth or defend share.

    Watch: Large hospital or plasma customers stretch payment terms or reduce inventory commitments.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual operating cash flow increased to $293.2 million in FY2026 from $181.7 million in FY2025.

    Open source ↗
  • Haemonetics’ capital allocation must stay disciplined because the balance sheet can support investment, but liabilities leave less room for a large failed acquisition or prolonged operating stumble.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    Liabilities were $1.600 billion at FY2026 year-end versus cash of $245.4 million. Good capital allocation can compound per-share value; a bad deal or debt-funded strategic error would reduce flexibility just as the business needs investment.

    Watch: Management pursues a large debt-funded acquisition in an adjacent device category without clear customer overlap.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Liabilities were $1.600 billion at FY2026 year-end versus cash of $245.4 million.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

Haemonetics’ role in quality- and efficiency-critical blood and plasma workflows should keep customer demand recurring, but that stickiness is under test after the FY2026 revenue decline. If workflow stickiness holds, revenue can stabilize and grow without constant reinvention; if customers can switch platforms easily, the business becomes a lower-quality equipment cycle.

Haemonetics’ higher-value procedure and consumables mix should protect pricing and expand gross profit even when headline revenue is uneven. Gross-profit durability is the clearest sign that the business has pricing power or favorable mix rather than commodity-device economics.

The company’s operating model must convert higher gross profit into GAAP operating income; otherwise spending, integration, or compliance costs are absorbing the economic advantage. Owners only benefit from mix improvement if it reaches operating profit rather than being consumed by restructuring, SG&A, R&D, or remediation costs.

The recurring consumables and procedure-driven nature of the business should translate accounting earnings into strong operating cash flow, giving Haemonetics funding flexibility even when GAAP earnings are volatile. Cash conversion funds R&D, acquisitions, debt reduction, or buybacks; if it weakens, the company has less room to fix growth or defend share.

Haemonetics’ capital allocation must stay disciplined because the balance sheet can support investment, but liabilities leave less room for a large failed acquisition or prolonged operating stumble. Good capital allocation can compound per-share value; a bad deal or debt-funded strategic error would reduce flexibility just as the business needs investment.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

its mission-critical blood and hospital procedure platforms remain sticky enough to lift mix and cash flow despite near-term revenue softness.

Evidence assessed Oct 16, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for Haemonetics

Where the evidence on Haemonetics disagrees: Mixed on the latest evidence (Oct 16, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 2 strengthening, 2 holding and 1 weakening.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • Haemonetics’ role in quality- and efficiency-critical blood and plasma workflows should keep customer demand recurring, but that stickiness is under test after the FY2026 revenue decline.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Haemonetics’ higher-value procedure and consumables mix should protect pricing and expand gross profit even when headline revenue is uneven.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The recurring consumables and procedure-driven nature of the business should translate accounting earnings into strong operating cash flow, giving Haemonetics funding flexibility even when GAAP earnings are volatile.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Haemonetics’ capital allocation must stay disciplined because the balance sheet can support investment, but liabilities leave less room for a large failed acquisition or prolonged operating stumble.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what the evidence questions

  • The company’s operating model must convert higher gross profit into GAAP operating income; otherwise spending, integration, or compliance costs are absorbing the economic advantage.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · Haemonetics

Loading the break-condition record for Haemonetics.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Regulation FD disclosure.

    Haemonetics filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-08: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Regulation FD disclosure.

    Haemonetics filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-08-18: Regulation FD disclosure. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    Haemonetics filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-08-06: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • A major plasma-collection customer standardizes new centers on a competing platform from Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies, Fresenius Kabi, or Grifols.
  • Hospital group purchasing organizations or plasma customers force price concessions that offset procedure-volume growth.
  • Product-quality, regulatory, or supply-chain issues require elevated spending and prevent operating leverage.
  • Large hospital or plasma customers stretch payment terms or reduce inventory commitments.
  • Management pursues a large debt-funded acquisition in an adjacent device category without clear customer overlap.

HAE news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

HAE income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

HAE: quick answers

Have members of Congress traded HAE?
13 trades in HAE have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed HAE trade
Which well-known investors own HAE?
1 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported HAE shares in their latest 13F filing. By share of the fund's portfolio: Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio), 0.0%. Fund portfolios

HAE in well-known investors’ portfolios

1 of 37 funds reported HAE shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.

FundOf its portfolioValueChangeQuarter
Ray DalioBridgewater Associates0.02%$4.5M+23.5%Q2 2026

Every fund’s portfolio

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.