GFL Environmental

GFLNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the GFL thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$43.38
+$0.97 (+2.29%)Today 1M +1.40%
After hours$42.92−1.06%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$42.41
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$42.10–$43.38
Regular-session low and high so far today.
6.2M
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Not yet confirmed
The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
$33.33–$46.77
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own GFL if its local refuse-services density and pricing power turn a reshaped asset base into recurring cash flow, rather than a one-time earnings reset.

GFL price history

Latest price$43.38Today+$0.97 (+2.29%)
GFL +2.02%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

5 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • GFL’s local refuse-route density and essential-service reliability continue to translate customer need into recurring demand and pricing power, rather than growth depending mainly on acquisitions or accounting changes.HoldingMateriality: High

    Annual IFRS revenue was CAD 6.6159 billion in FY2025, up 7.8% from CAD 6.1388 billion in FY2024. If this holds, revenue can grow on a more durable organic base; if it breaks, GFL becomes a lower-quality roll-up exposed to bid losses and volume cycles.

    Watch: Waste Management, Republic Services, Waste Connections, or aggressive local haulers win major municipal or commercial routes on price, weakening GFL’s route density.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Annual IFRS revenue was CAD 6.6159 billion in FY2025, up 7.8% from CAD 6.1388 billion in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
  • GFL’s operating density, routing discipline, and disposal-cost control continue to convert revenue into better unit economics despite labor, fuel, maintenance, and compliance cost pressure.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    Estimated annual gross_profit increased to CAD 1.3673 billion in FY2025 from CAD 1.1288 billion in FY2024. Margin expansion is the bridge from essential-service revenue to equity value; if cost inflation or poor density absorbs price, growth will not create much owner value.

    Watch: A sustained wage, fuel, insurance, or fleet-maintenance shock prevents GFL from passing costs through to customers.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Estimated annual gross_profit increased to CAD 1.3673 billion in FY2025 from CAD 1.1288 billion in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
  • GFL’s recurring billing base and capital discipline generate enough operating cash flow to fund the waste platform without relying heavily on new debt or equity.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    Annual IFRS operating_cash_flow was positive in each available year from FY2022 through FY2025. Cash conversion determines whether growth belongs to shareholders or is consumed by capex, working capital, acquisitions, and creditors.

    Watch: Fleet replacement, container investment, landfill obligations, remediation costs, or working-capital needs absorb cash faster than operating routes generate it.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Annual IFRS operating_cash_flow was positive in each available year from FY2022 through FY2025.

    Open source ↗
  • GFL’s portfolio and cash-flow discipline continue to reduce balance-sheet risk so more enterprise value accrues to equity rather than creditors.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    IFRS liabilities declined to CAD 11.8098 billion at FY2025 year-end from CAD 13.9857 billion at FY2024 year-end. Lower leverage increases resilience and gives shareholders more upside from the same operating improvement; re-levering would make the equity more fragile.

    Watch: Management restarts a debt-funded acquisition program before the core business demonstrates durable cash generation.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    IFRS liabilities declined to CAD 11.8098 billion at FY2025 year-end from CAD 13.9857 billion at FY2024 year-end.

    Open source ↗
  • The FY2025 earnings inflection must prove to be a cleaner recurring earnings base rather than a one-year accounting gain from portfolio actions.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    Annual IFRS net_income swung to CAD 3.8134 billion in FY2025 from a CAD 737.7 million loss in FY2024. If earnings are recurring, the equity can be valued on a stronger profit base; if not, investors should anchor on cash flow and normalized margins instead of the headline EPS.

    Watch: Future filings show most FY2025 profit came from discontinued operations, disposal gains, tax effects, or other non-recurring items rather than continuing refuse operations.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Annual IFRS net_income swung to CAD 3.8134 billion in FY2025 from a CAD 737.7 million loss in FY2024.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

GFL’s local refuse-route density and essential-service reliability continue to translate customer need into recurring demand and pricing power, rather than growth depending mainly on acquisitions or accounting changes. If this holds, revenue can grow on a more durable organic base; if it breaks, GFL becomes a lower-quality roll-up exposed to bid losses and volume cycles.

GFL’s operating density, routing discipline, and disposal-cost control continue to convert revenue into better unit economics despite labor, fuel, maintenance, and compliance cost pressure. Margin expansion is the bridge from essential-service revenue to equity value; if cost inflation or poor density absorbs price, growth will not create much owner value.

GFL’s recurring billing base and capital discipline generate enough operating cash flow to fund the waste platform without relying heavily on new debt or equity. Cash conversion determines whether growth belongs to shareholders or is consumed by capex, working capital, acquisitions, and creditors.

GFL’s portfolio and cash-flow discipline continue to reduce balance-sheet risk so more enterprise value accrues to equity rather than creditors. Lower leverage increases resilience and gives shareholders more upside from the same operating improvement; re-levering would make the equity more fragile.

The FY2025 earnings inflection must prove to be a cleaner recurring earnings base rather than a one-year accounting gain from portfolio actions. If earnings are recurring, the equity can be valued on a stronger profit base; if not, investors should anchor on cash flow and normalized margins instead of the headline EPS.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

its local refuse-services density and pricing power turn a reshaped asset base into recurring cash flow, rather than a one-time earnings reset.

Evidence assessed Nov 7, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for GFL Environmental

Where the evidence on GFL Environmental stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 7, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 2 strengthening and 3 holding.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • GFL’s local refuse-route density and essential-service reliability continue to translate customer need into recurring demand and pricing power, rather than growth depending mainly on acquisitions or accounting changes.

    sec.gov ↗

  • GFL’s operating density, routing discipline, and disposal-cost control continue to convert revenue into better unit economics despite labor, fuel, maintenance, and compliance cost pressure.

    sec.gov ↗

  • GFL’s recurring billing base and capital discipline generate enough operating cash flow to fund the waste platform without relying heavily on new debt or equity.

    sec.gov ↗

  • GFL’s portfolio and cash-flow discipline continue to reduce balance-sheet risk so more enterprise value accrues to equity rather than creditors.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The FY2025 earnings inflection must prove to be a cleaner recurring earnings base rather than a one-year accounting gain from portfolio actions.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • Waste Management, Republic Services, Waste Connections, or aggressive local haulers win major municipal or commercial routes on price, weakening GFL’s route density.

    sec.gov ↗

  • A sustained wage, fuel, insurance, or fleet-maintenance shock prevents GFL from passing costs through to customers.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Fleet replacement, container investment, landfill obligations, remediation costs, or working-capital needs absorb cash faster than operating routes generate it.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · GFL Environmental

12 mo agonow
Trailing daily price. No thesis break has crossed here, so there is no break base rate to project.

OptimistFi is watching GFL Environmental. No break-condition checks are on record yet — they accumulate as new filings are checked.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Foreign issuer material report (6-K).

    GFL Environmental filed an SEC report on 2026-10-30: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Foreign issuer material report (6-K).

    GFL Environmental filed an SEC report on 2026-10-28: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Foreign issuer material report (6-K).

    GFL Environmental filed an SEC report on 2026-10-08: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • Waste Management, Republic Services, Waste Connections, or aggressive local haulers win major municipal or commercial routes on price, weakening GFL’s route density.
  • A sustained wage, fuel, insurance, or fleet-maintenance shock prevents GFL from passing costs through to customers.
  • Fleet replacement, container investment, landfill obligations, remediation costs, or working-capital needs absorb cash faster than operating routes generate it.
  • Management restarts a debt-funded acquisition program before the core business demonstrates durable cash generation.
  • Future filings show most FY2025 profit came from discontinued operations, disposal gains, tax effects, or other non-recurring items rather than continuing refuse operations.

GFL news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

GFL income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

GFL: quick answers

What is GFL's short interest?
As of October 30, 2026, 19.8M GFL shares were sold short, down 10.8% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 3.2 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. GFL short interest history
Have members of Congress traded GFL?
6 trades in GFL have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed GFL trade
Which well-known investors own GFL?
2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported GFL shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Maverick Capital, 3.3%; Soros Fund Management (George Soros), 0.0%. Fund portfolios

GFL in well-known investors’ portfolios

2 of 37 funds reported GFL shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.

FundOf its portfolioValueChangeQuarter
Maverick Capital3.3%$375M+165.0%Q2 2026
George SorosSoros Fund Management0.00%$342K−98.3%Q2 2026

Every fund’s portfolio

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.