Eagle Materials

EXPNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the EXP thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$184.24
−$3.61 (−1.92%)Today 1M +11.86%
After hours$184.240.00%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$187.85
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$184.08–$188.94
Regular-session low and high so far today.
327.9K
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Jan 28 projected
Projected for 2027-01-28 from the company’s own results filings (SEC 8-K Item 2.02). The company has not confirmed the date.
$160.02–$245.53
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own EXP if its local cement economics preserve pricing power through the construction cycle and management does not dilute that advantage with late-cycle leverage.

EXP price history

Latest price$184.24Today−$3.61 (-1.92%)
EXP +11.64%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

5 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • Freight and permitting barriers continue to make Eagle’s cement markets local enough that added supply cannot quickly undercut pricing, allowing gross profit to remain resilient through normal construction cycles.HoldingMateriality: High

    GAAP annual gross_profit was $652.5 million in FY2026, still well above $519.6 million in FY2022 despite commodity and construction cyclicality. If local pricing power holds, Eagle can earn attractive margins even without fast revenue growth; if it breaks, the business becomes a more ordinary cyclical commodity producer.

    Watch: Holcim, Cemex, CRH or Heidelberg Materials adds local capacity or import-terminal access in Eagle’s key markets, making delivered cement supply less scarce.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual gross_profit was $652.5 million in FY2026, still well above $519.6 million in FY2022 despite commodity and construction cyclicality.

    Open source ↗
  • U.S. construction and infrastructure demand must be strong enough in Eagle’s served markets to absorb rate-sensitive housing and commercial weakness; otherwise local asset quality will not translate into incremental sales.HoldingMateriality: High

    GAAP annual revenue rose to $2.309 billion in FY2026 from $2.261 billion in FY2025. The stock needs demand to convert the moat into revenue; without that, pricing power may only defend profitability rather than drive growth.

    Watch: Persistently high mortgage rates suppress housing starts and repair/remodel demand that use cement and related building materials.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual revenue rose to $2.309 billion in FY2026 from $2.261 billion in FY2025.

    Open source ↗
  • Plant efficiency and working-capital discipline continue to convert cyclical accounting earnings into operating cash, giving Eagle funding capacity for reinvestment, debt service and owner returns.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    GAAP annual operating_cash_flow was $614.2 million in FY2026, up from $548.5 million in FY2025. Strong cash conversion lets owners benefit even when reported earnings are cyclically pressured; if cash conversion weakens, the balance sheet and capital-return story deteriorate.

    Watch: Fuel, power or raw-material inflation rises faster than Eagle can pass through pricing, increasing working-capital needs and pressuring cash conversion.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual operating_cash_flow was $614.2 million in FY2026, up from $548.5 million in FY2025.

    Open source ↗
  • Management keeps expansion and acquisition spending inside the cash-generating capacity of the assets rather than using rising debt to chase late-cycle volume.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    GAAP liabilities increased to $2.367 billion at FY2026 year-end from $1.808 billion at FY2025 year-end. Disciplined leverage preserves downside protection in a cyclical materials business; undisciplined leverage can turn a margin downturn into permanent equity impairment.

    Watch: Eagle announces a large debt-funded acquisition while construction demand indicators are weakening.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP liabilities increased to $2.367 billion at FY2026 year-end from $1.808 billion at FY2025 year-end.

    Open source ↗
  • Capital allocation must turn cyclical cash generation into per-share value through well-timed reinvestment and owner returns, rather than letting commodity margin pressure absorb the cash.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    GAAP annual eps_diluted was $13.16 in FY2026, above $12.46 in FY2023. For shareholders, the ultimate test is whether cash flow becomes higher per-share earnings across the cycle; if not, the business can be healthy while the stock disappoints.

    Watch: Management overpays for acquisitions or expansion projects that do not earn through-cycle returns above the cost of capital.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GAAP annual eps_diluted was $13.16 in FY2026, above $12.46 in FY2023.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

Freight and permitting barriers continue to make Eagle’s cement markets local enough that added supply cannot quickly undercut pricing, allowing gross profit to remain resilient through normal construction cycles. If local pricing power holds, Eagle can earn attractive margins even without fast revenue growth; if it breaks, the business becomes a more ordinary cyclical commodity producer.

U.S. construction and infrastructure demand must be strong enough in Eagle’s served markets to absorb rate-sensitive housing and commercial weakness; otherwise local asset quality will not translate into incremental sales. The stock needs demand to convert the moat into revenue; without that, pricing power may only defend profitability rather than drive growth.

Plant efficiency and working-capital discipline continue to convert cyclical accounting earnings into operating cash, giving Eagle funding capacity for reinvestment, debt service and owner returns. Strong cash conversion lets owners benefit even when reported earnings are cyclically pressured; if cash conversion weakens, the balance sheet and capital-return story deteriorate.

Management keeps expansion and acquisition spending inside the cash-generating capacity of the assets rather than using rising debt to chase late-cycle volume. Disciplined leverage preserves downside protection in a cyclical materials business; undisciplined leverage can turn a margin downturn into permanent equity impairment.

Capital allocation must turn cyclical cash generation into per-share value through well-timed reinvestment and owner returns, rather than letting commodity margin pressure absorb the cash. For shareholders, the ultimate test is whether cash flow becomes higher per-share earnings across the cycle; if not, the business can be healthy while the stock disappoints.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

its local cement economics preserve pricing power through the construction cycle and management does not dilute that advantage with late-cycle leverage.

Evidence assessed Oct 15, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for Eagle Materials

Where the evidence on Eagle Materials stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Oct 15, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 1 strengthening and 4 holding.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • Freight and permitting barriers continue to make Eagle’s cement markets local enough that added supply cannot quickly undercut pricing, allowing gross profit to remain resilient through normal construction cycles.

    sec.gov ↗

  • U.S. construction and infrastructure demand must be strong enough in Eagle’s served markets to absorb rate-sensitive housing and commercial weakness; otherwise local asset quality will not translate into incremental sales.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Plant efficiency and working-capital discipline continue to convert cyclical accounting earnings into operating cash, giving Eagle funding capacity for reinvestment, debt service and owner returns.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Management keeps expansion and acquisition spending inside the cash-generating capacity of the assets rather than using rising debt to chase late-cycle volume.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Capital allocation must turn cyclical cash generation into per-share value through well-timed reinvestment and owner returns, rather than letting commodity margin pressure absorb the cash.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • Holcim, Cemex, CRH or Heidelberg Materials adds local capacity or import-terminal access in Eagle’s key markets, making delivered cement supply less scarce.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Persistently high mortgage rates suppress housing starts and repair/remodel demand that use cement and related building materials.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Fuel, power or raw-material inflation rises faster than Eagle can pass through pricing, increasing working-capital needs and pressuring cash conversion.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

What has broken in Eagle Materials’s thesis

Each break OptimistFi flagged on Eagle Materials, dated — with what has historically followed the same kind of break across the market, not a forecast for Eagle Materials.

peers+14%-15%-1%12 mo agonow+6 mo
Daily price, then where similar breaks led across the market: the typical -1% path vs comparable companies over six months, inside the middle-half range (+14% to -15%). A base rate, not a forecast.
  • Analyst downgradecondition set before this filing

    Across all companies, this kind of break has happened 12,641 times before. Those stocks trailed comparable companies by a median of 1% over the next six months, and 33% of them trailed it by 10 points or more.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against comparable companies after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    Eagle Materials filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-07-29: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Director or principal officer change.

    Eagle Materials filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-05-28: Director or principal officer change. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Director or principal officer change.

    Eagle Materials filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-05-21: Director or principal officer change. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • Holcim, Cemex, CRH or Heidelberg Materials adds local capacity or import-terminal access in Eagle’s key markets, making delivered cement supply less scarce.
  • Persistently high mortgage rates suppress housing starts and repair/remodel demand that use cement and related building materials.
  • Fuel, power or raw-material inflation rises faster than Eagle can pass through pricing, increasing working-capital needs and pressuring cash conversion.
  • Eagle announces a large debt-funded acquisition while construction demand indicators are weakening.
  • Management overpays for acquisitions or expansion projects that do not earn through-cycle returns above the cost of capital.

EXP news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

EXP income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

EXP: quick answers

When does Eagle Materials (EXP) report earnings next?
Eagle Materials's next results are projected for January 28, 2027, from the dates of its own results filings with the SEC. The company has not confirmed the date. It last reported on November 4, 2026. Earnings calendar
What is EXP's short interest?
As of October 30, 2026, 1.9M EXP shares were sold short, 6.14% of its shares outstanding, down 3.8% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 4.9 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. EXP short interest history
Have members of Congress traded EXP?
2 trades in EXP have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed EXP trade
Which well-known investors own EXP?
2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported EXP shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: Baupost Group (Seth Klarman), 2.2%; Markel Group (Tom Gayner), 0.0%. Fund portfolios

EXP in well-known investors’ portfolios

2 of 37 funds reported EXP shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.

FundOf its portfolioValueChangeQuarter
Seth KlarmanBaupost Group2.2%$119M−40.5%Q2 2026
Tom GaynerMarkel Group0.02%$2.5MNo changeQ3 2026

Every fund’s portfolio

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.