The Campbell's Company
CPBNASDAQUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- $22.59 Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- $21.58–$22.33 Regular-session low and high so far today.
- 4.7M Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
- Not yet confirmed The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
- $18.60–$32.04 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own CPB if it re‑establishes pricing/promo discipline and extracts synergies from recent acquisitions before commodity, retailer and regulatory pressures permanently compress margins.
CPB price history
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
If Campbell's executes its revenue growth management and supply‑chain productivity programs, it will restore operating leverage and improve operating income despite inflationary input costs; failure to do so will allow commodity and retail pressures to depress margins.HoldingMateriality: High
MD&A describes ongoing cost savings initiatives, supply chain productivity and revenue growth management (Item 7 MD&A). Operating income recovery is the mechanism that converts brand scale into free cash flow and funds buybacks/dividends or M&A; if margins don't recover the equity's cash return profile is weaker.
Watch: Sustained tariff or input‑cost increases (e.g., tinplate steel, ingredients) that management cannot offset with pricing.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
MD&A describes ongoing cost savings initiatives, supply chain productivity and revenue growth management (Item 7 MD&A).
Open source ↗Expanded premium sauce and snacking capabilities (Sovos acquisition and 49% La Regina stake) will allow Campbell's to shift mix toward higher‑margin, premium SKUs and stabilize revenue against private‑label pressure, provided integration and marketing succeed.HoldingMateriality: High
Business text documents the Sovos Brands acquisition (March 12, 2024) and the May 4, 2026 49% acquisition of La Regina (Item 1 Business / MD&A). Successful premiumization raises gross margins and reduces sensitivity to price competition; failure means increased exposure to private‑label volume loss and slower revenue growth.
Watch: Retailer consolidation or deliberate expansion of private‑label programs that displace branded shelf space.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Business text documents the Sovos Brands acquisition (March 12, 2024) and the May 4, 2026 49% acquisition of La Regina.
Open source ↗Campbell's operating cash flow should remain a durable source of capital for dividends, disciplined buybacks and selective M&A unless working‑capital or margin conversion weakens; a sustained drop in operating cash flow would signal loss of the firm's cash engine.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium
operating_cash_flow has stayed roughly around $1.0–1.18 billion in recent years: 1,143,000,000 (FY2023), 1,131,000,000 (FY2025), 1,039,000,000 (FY2026) (field: operating_cash_flow). Operating cash flow funds returns to shareholders and strategic investments; sustained weakness reduces optionality and increases financial risk.
Watch: Large inventory builds or working‑capital swings from supply dislocations or tariff‑driven sourcing changes that consume cash.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
operating_cash_flow has stayed roughly around $1.0–1.18 billion in recent years: 1,143,000,000 (FY2023), 1,131,000,000 (FY2025), 1,039,000,000 (FY2026) (field: operating_cash_flow).
Open source ↗Heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential limits on ultra‑processed foods (labeling, marketing restrictions or reformulation mandates) could force costly changes and reduce demand for core SKUs, pressuring gross profit unless Campbell's reformulates successfully without losing consumers.HoldingMateriality: Medium
MD&A cites increased regulatory activity, FDA/state developments and MAHA Commission reports that could affect ingredients, labeling and packaging (Item 7 MD&A). Regulatory-driven reformulation or marketing limits would hit both costs (reformulation, packaging) and revenue (reduced consumption or changed positioning), impairing margins and brand value.
Watch: If Campbell's can reformulate affordably and retain taste/brand equity, the impact may be muted.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
MD&A cites increased regulatory activity, FDA/state developments and MAHA Commission reports that could affect ingredients, labeling and packaging (Item 7.
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
If Campbell's executes its revenue growth management and supply‑chain productivity programs, it will restore operating leverage and improve operating income despite inflationary input costs; failure to do so will allow commodity and retail pressures to depress margins. Operating income recovery is the mechanism that converts brand scale into free cash flow and funds buybacks/dividends or M&A; if margins don't recover the equity's cash return profile is weaker.
Expanded premium sauce and snacking capabilities (Sovos acquisition and 49% La Regina stake) will allow Campbell's to shift mix toward higher‑margin, premium SKUs and stabilize revenue against private‑label pressure, provided integration and marketing succeed. Successful premiumization raises gross margins and reduces sensitivity to price competition; failure means increased exposure to private‑label volume loss and slower revenue growth.
Campbell's operating cash flow should remain a durable source of capital for dividends, disciplined buybacks and selective M&A unless working‑capital or margin conversion weakens; a sustained drop in operating cash flow would signal loss of the firm's cash engine. Operating cash flow funds returns to shareholders and strategic investments; sustained weakness reduces optionality and increases financial risk.
Heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential limits on ultra‑processed foods (labeling, marketing restrictions or reformulation mandates) could force costly changes and reduce demand for core SKUs, pressuring gross profit unless Campbell's reformulates successfully without losing consumers. Regulatory-driven reformulation or marketing limits would hit both costs (reformulation, packaging) and revenue (reduced consumption or changed positioning), impairing margins and brand value.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
it re‑establishes pricing/promo discipline and extracts synergies from recent acquisitions before commodity, retailer and regulatory pressures permanently compress margins.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for CAMPBELL'S Co
Where the evidence on CAMPBELL'S Co stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 7, 2026). Of its 4 thesis points, 1 strengthening and 3 holding.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
If Campbell's executes its revenue growth management and supply‑chain productivity programs, it will restore operating leverage and improve operating income despite inflationary input costs; failure to do so will allow commodity and retail pressures to depress margins.
Expanded premium sauce and snacking capabilities (Sovos acquisition and 49% La Regina stake) will allow Campbell's to shift mix toward higher‑margin, premium SKUs and stabilize revenue against private‑label pressure, provided integration and marketing succeed.
Campbell's operating cash flow should remain a durable source of capital for dividends, disciplined buybacks and selective M&A unless working‑capital or margin conversion weakens; a sustained drop in operating cash flow would signal loss of the firm's cash engine.
Heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential limits on ultra‑processed foods (labeling, marketing restrictions or reformulation mandates) could force costly changes and reduce demand for core SKUs, pressuring gross profit unless Campbell's reformulates successfully without losing consumers.
Bear case: what would count against it
Sustained tariff or input‑cost increases (e.g., tinplate steel, ingredients) that management cannot offset with pricing.
Retailer consolidation or deliberate expansion of private‑label programs that displace branded shelf space.
Large inventory builds or working‑capital swings from supply dislocations or tariff‑driven sourcing changes that consume cash.
Company research
Research on CAMPBELL'S Co
- Reporting · European Dividend Growth Investor Explains The Campbell's Company (NASDAQ: CPB) Cut
European Dividend Growth Investor focused on shrinking earnings and debt pressure. Official results support the framework but correct two figures.
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · CAMPBELL'S Co
Loading the break-condition record for CAMPBELL'S Co.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
- MixedOther material event.
CAMPBELL'S Co filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-05: Other material event. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedEntered a material definitive agreement.
CAMPBELL'S Co filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-17: Entered a material definitive agreement. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
- MixedReported results of operations (earnings release).
CAMPBELL'S Co filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-03: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- Sustained tariff or input‑cost increases (e.g., tinplate steel, ingredients) that management cannot offset with pricing.
- Retailer consolidation or deliberate expansion of private‑label programs that displace branded shelf space.
- Large inventory builds or working‑capital swings from supply dislocations or tariff‑driven sourcing changes that consume cash.
- If Campbell's can reformulate affordably and retain taste/brand equity, the impact may be muted.
CPB news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
CPB income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
CPB: quick answers
- Have members of Congress traded CPB?
- Reports made public in the last 90 days disclose 2 trades in CPB by 2 filers: 0 purchases and 2 sales. They are filed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President and senior officials. Every disclosed CPB trade
- Which well-known investors own CPB?
- 1 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported CPB shares in their latest 13F filing. By share of the fund's portfolio: Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio), 0.0%. Fund portfolios
CPB in well-known investors’ portfolios
1 of 37 funds reported CPB shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.
| Fund | Of its portfolio | Value | Change | Quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray DalioBridgewater Associates | 0.00% | $944K | +268.5% | Q2 2026 |
