Canadian Pacific Kansas City

CPNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the CP thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$93.77
−$0.02 (−0.02%)Today 1M +11.05%
After hours$93.770.00%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$93.79
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$93.21–$94.06
Regular-session low and high so far today.
1.6M
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Jan 27 projected
Projected for 2027-01-27 from the company’s own results filings (SEC 8-K Item 2.02). The company has not confirmed the date.
$68.83–$96.90
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own CP if CP can compound value by converting its across‑North‑America network scale (including the KCS link to Mexico) into persistent volume growth, high single‑digit revenue gains and strong cash conversion via continued productivity improvements.

CP price history

Latest price$93.77Today−$0.02 (-0.02%)
CP +9.92%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

4 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • Sustained train productivity improvements (higher GTMs per train mile and average train weight) will continue to translate volume growth into operating‑margin expansion and cash conversion.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    GTMs increased 4% (403,891 million in 2025 vs 388,958 million in 2024) while train miles rose 1% (47,170k vs 46,892k) (MD&A). If true, incremental revenue largely drops to the operating line and free cash flow, supporting buybacks/debt paydown and justifying a premium multiple; if false, revenue growth will fail to produce durable margin or cash gains.

    Watch: A prolonged supply‑chain or port disruption that forces network re‑routing and reduces train productivity.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    GTMs increased 4% (403,891 million in 2025 vs 388,958 million in 2024) while train miles rose 1% (47,170k vs 46,892k).

    Open source ↗
  • Revenue growth will be sustained by higher RTMs and carloads in Intermodal, Grain, Potash, Coal and Automotive rather than by pricing alone; volume mix is the primary top‑line driver.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    Total revenues increased 4% in 2025 to CAD 15,078 million driven by higher RTMs and carloads (MD&A / fundamentals). If volumes keep rising the company can grow revenue with modest incremental cost; if volumes reverse or secular demand (e.g., coal) falls, top‑line growth will slow and margins will be harder to sustain.

    Watch: Secular decline in demand for coal or crude (energy transition) reducing volumes on key lanes.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Total revenues increased 4% in 2025 to CAD 15,078 million driven by higher RTMs and carloads (MD&A / fundamentals).

    Open source ↗
  • The KCS acquisition creates differentiated cross‑border lanes to Mexico that lift utilization and yields versus pre‑transaction levels, sustaining above‑market growth and better yield mix.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    MD&A cites higher volumes of U.S. grain to Mexico and increased Grain volumes to Vancouver and Thunder Bay as contributors to 2025 revenue. If CP captures cross‑border growth and pricing advantages, revenue per RTM and total RTMs will benefit beyond domestic peers; if synergies or regulatory obligations blunt the benefit, expected growth and margins will be overstated.

    Watch: Failure to realize expected routing/operational synergies or additional STB/regulatory constraints that limit routing flexibility.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    MD&A cites higher volumes of U.S. grain to Mexico and increased Grain volumes to Vancouver and Thunder Bay as contributors.

    Open source ↗
  • High operating cash flow conversion will continue to fund capital expenditure, environmental remediation obligations and shareholder returns (buybacks/debt paydown), supporting EPS growth.StrengtheningMateriality: Medium

    Operating cash flow remained strong: CAD 5,309 million in 2025 (fundamentals). If cash conversion holds, EPS can grow even with modest revenue growth; if cash generation weakens because of higher capex, remediation or operating headwinds, per‑share returns will suffer.

    Watch: Large, unplanned environmental remediation or legal settlements (business_text outlines environmental liabilities and potential significant costs).

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    Operating cash flow remained strong: CAD 5,309 million in 2025 (fundamentals).

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

Sustained train productivity improvements (higher GTMs per train mile and average train weight) will continue to translate volume growth into operating‑margin expansion and cash conversion. If true, incremental revenue largely drops to the operating line and free cash flow, supporting buybacks/debt paydown and justifying a premium multiple; if false, revenue growth will fail to produce durable margin or cash gains.

Revenue growth will be sustained by higher RTMs and carloads in Intermodal, Grain, Potash, Coal and Automotive rather than by pricing alone; volume mix is the primary top‑line driver. If volumes keep rising the company can grow revenue with modest incremental cost; if volumes reverse or secular demand (e.g., coal) falls, top‑line growth will slow and margins will be harder to sustain.

The KCS acquisition creates differentiated cross‑border lanes to Mexico that lift utilization and yields versus pre‑transaction levels, sustaining above‑market growth and better yield mix. If CP captures cross‑border growth and pricing advantages, revenue per RTM and total RTMs will benefit beyond domestic peers; if synergies or regulatory obligations blunt the benefit, expected growth and margins will be overstated.

High operating cash flow conversion will continue to fund capital expenditure, environmental remediation obligations and shareholder returns (buybacks/debt paydown), supporting EPS growth. If cash conversion holds, EPS can grow even with modest revenue growth; if cash generation weakens because of higher capex, remediation or operating headwinds, per‑share returns will suffer.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

CP can compound value by converting its across‑North‑America network scale (including the KCS link to Mexico) into persistent volume growth, high single‑digit revenue gains and strong cash conversion via continued productivity improvements.

Evidence assessed Nov 7, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for Canadian Pacific Kansas City

Where the evidence on Canadian Pacific Kansas City stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Nov 7, 2026). Of its 4 thesis points, 3 strengthening and 1 holding.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • Sustained train productivity improvements (higher GTMs per train mile and average train weight) will continue to translate volume growth into operating‑margin expansion and cash conversion.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Revenue growth will be sustained by higher RTMs and carloads in Intermodal, Grain, Potash, Coal and Automotive rather than by pricing alone; volume mix is the primary top‑line driver.

    sec.gov ↗

  • The KCS acquisition creates differentiated cross‑border lanes to Mexico that lift utilization and yields versus pre‑transaction levels, sustaining above‑market growth and better yield mix.

    sec.gov ↗

  • High operating cash flow conversion will continue to fund capital expenditure, environmental remediation obligations and shareholder returns (buybacks/debt paydown), supporting EPS growth.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • A prolonged supply‑chain or port disruption that forces network re‑routing and reduces train productivity.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Secular decline in demand for coal or crude (energy transition) reducing volumes on key lanes.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Failure to realize expected routing/operational synergies or additional STB/regulatory constraints that limit routing flexibility.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · Canadian Pacific Kansas City

Loading the break-condition record for Canadian Pacific Kansas City.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Other material event.

    Canadian Pacific Kansas City filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-30: Other material event. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Reported results of operations (earnings release).

    Canadian Pacific Kansas City filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-10-28: Reported results of operations (earnings release). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Other material event.

    Canadian Pacific Kansas City filed an SEC 8-K on 2026-09-29: Other material event. It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • A prolonged supply‑chain or port disruption that forces network re‑routing and reduces train productivity.
  • Secular decline in demand for coal or crude (energy transition) reducing volumes on key lanes.
  • Failure to realize expected routing/operational synergies or additional STB/regulatory constraints that limit routing flexibility.
  • Large, unplanned environmental remediation or legal settlements (business_text outlines environmental liabilities and potential significant costs).

CP news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

CP income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

CP: quick answers

When does Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) report earnings next?
Canadian Pacific Kansas City's next results are projected for January 27, 2027, from the dates of its own results filings with the SEC. The company has not confirmed the date. It last reported on October 28, 2026. Earnings calendar
What is CP's short interest?
As of October 30, 2026, 17.2M CP shares were sold short, 1.97% of its shares outstanding, down 8.4% from the count before. At the stock's average daily volume that is 6.6 days to cover. FINRA publishes the count twice a month. CP short interest history
Have members of Congress traded CP?
14 trades in CP have been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed CP trade
Which well-known investors own CP?
2 of the 37 well-known funds tracked here reported CP shares in their latest 13F filings. By share of the fund's portfolio: TCI Fund Management (Chris Hohn), 7.4%; Markel Group (Tom Gayner), 0.1%. Fund portfolios

CP in well-known investors’ portfolios

2 of 37 funds reported CP shares in their latest 13F filing. A 13F shows quarter-end positions and arrives up to 45 days later.

FundOf its portfolioValueChangeQuarter
Chris HohnTCI Fund Management7.4%$3.9B−2.6%Q2 2026
Tom GaynerMarkel Group0.05%$6.8M+8.9%Q3 2026

Every fund’s portfolio

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.