Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais - CEMIG

CIGNYSEUSD

THESIS ALERT

Email me when the CIG thesis changes

Evidence-based analysis, not personalized investment advice. Every alert email carries an unsubscribe link.

Follow on X
$1.90
+$0.03 (+1.60%)Today 1M −22.08%
After hours$1.900.00%

Updated Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET · Regular session · May be delayed

Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
$1.87
Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
$1.89–$1.92
Regular-session low and high so far today.
3.2M
Regular-session shares traded · Nov 11, 4:00 PM ET.
Not yet confirmed
The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
$1.77–$2.76
52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.

Understand the Business

Why the Stock Moved

Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.

The core investment thesis

Own CIG if regulators continue cost recovery and hydrological conditions remain normal.

CIG price history

Latest price$1.90Today+$0.03 (+1.60%)
CIG -21.33%S&P 500 -2.42%Since first plotted close
4 hours

Loading recent earnings…

Investment thesis

What must happen next

4 MATERIAL PROPOSITIONS
  • Regulatory tariff mechanics and concession protections (the company’s primary pricing regime) will continue to preserve cash-flow margins so that operating cash flow remains positive and roughly in line with recent years.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    operating_cash_flow: 2024 = 5,496,000,000 BRL. If true, CIG will keep funding capex, service liabilities and pay shareholders from predictable operating cash flow; if false, cash strain will force cuts to capex/dividends or raise financing cost.

    Watch: ANEEL tariff formula changes that remove automatic cost-recovery or lower allowed returns.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    operating_cash_flow: 2024 = 5,496,000,000 BRL.

    Open source ↗
  • CIG’s large regulated asset base (generation + network) creates a structural moat because physical grid and hydro reservoirs are high fixed-cost, location-specific assets that limit new entrants and support tariff-based recovery of invested capital.StrengtheningMateriality: High

    assets: 2024 = 59,726,000,000 BRL (up from 55,000,000,000 BRL in 2023 and growing over the period). A durable asset-backed moat preserves price-setting / cost-recovery leverage and allows stable margins and returns on invested capital; loss of the asset recovery regime would destroy the moat and future returns.

    Watch: Regulatory refusal to allow capex recovery in future tariff cycles or a regime that shifts more fixed costs to shareholders.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    assets: 2024 = 59,726,000,000 BRL (up from 55,000,000,000 BRL in 2023 and growing over the period).

    Open source ↗
  • Because CIG’s generation is materially exposed to hydropower, hydrological conditions are a leading driver of margins — normal/above-average inflows preserve gross profit and net income, while multi-year droughts will raise purchase costs and compress margins.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    net_income: rising from 2,865,000,000 BRL (2020) to 7,119,000,000 BRL (2024) — suggests sensitivity to operating environment and commodity conditions. Hydrology will cause material swings in generation margins and therefore earnings; investors must treat reservoir trends and seasonal reports as leading indicators of margin risk.

    Watch: Multi-year below-average rainfall reducing reservoir levels and domestic hydro generation, forcing expensive spot purchases.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    net_income: rising from 2,865,000,000 BRL (2020) to 7,119,000,000 BRL (2024) — suggests sensitivity to operating environment and commodity conditions.

    Open source ↗
  • CIG’s ability to convert accounting earnings into free cash and to finance/receive tariff recovery for capex will determine shareholder returns; persistent declines in operating cash flow versus accounting profits would signal structural stress in working capital, procurement costs or regulatory.HoldingMateriality: Medium

    operating_cash_flow: positive every reported year (2020 = 8,607,000,000 BRL. If earnings do not convert into cash the company cannot sustain dividends or capex without raising expensive debt or diluting shareholders; if conversion holds, shareholders benefit from stable dividends and lower financing risk.

    Watch: Large capex projects not accepted into regulatory base (denied tariff recovery) or a spike in working capital needs.

    Supporting sources

    Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.

    operating_cash_flow: positive every reported year (2020 = 8,607,000,000 BRL.

    Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence

Loading the original research archive…

Original research

Regulatory tariff mechanics and concession protections (the company’s primary pricing regime) will continue to preserve cash-flow margins so that operating cash flow remains positive and roughly in line with recent years. If true, CIG will keep funding capex, service liabilities and pay shareholders from predictable operating cash flow; if false, cash strain will force cuts to capex/dividends or raise financing cost.

CIG’s large regulated asset base (generation + network) creates a structural moat because physical grid and hydro reservoirs are high fixed-cost, location-specific assets that limit new entrants and support tariff-based recovery of invested capital. A durable asset-backed moat preserves price-setting / cost-recovery leverage and allows stable margins and returns on invested capital; loss of the asset recovery regime would destroy the moat and future returns.

Because CIG’s generation is materially exposed to hydropower, hydrological conditions are a leading driver of margins — normal/above-average inflows preserve gross profit and net income, while multi-year droughts will raise purchase costs and compress margins. Hydrology will cause material swings in generation margins and therefore earnings; investors must treat reservoir trends and seasonal reports as leading indicators of margin risk.

CIG’s ability to convert accounting earnings into free cash and to finance/receive tariff recovery for capex will determine shareholder returns; persistent declines in operating cash flow versus accounting profits would signal structural stress in working capital, procurement costs or regulatory. If earnings do not convert into cash the company cannot sustain dividends or capex without raising expensive debt or diluting shareholders; if conversion holds, shareholders benefit from stable dividends and lower financing risk.

All standing thesis claims
Original report summary

regulators continue cost recovery and hydrological conditions remain normal.

Evidence assessed Oct 13, 2026. Expand each conclusion for its evidence and what would change it. Thesis evidence—not a buy or sell recommendation.

Bull case and bear case

Bull case and bear case for Energy Co of Minas Gerais

Where the evidence on Energy Co of Minas Gerais stands: Holding on the latest evidence (Oct 13, 2026). Of its 4 thesis points, 2 strengthening and 2 holding.

Bull case: what the evidence supports

  • Regulatory tariff mechanics and concession protections (the company’s primary pricing regime) will continue to preserve cash-flow margins so that operating cash flow remains positive and roughly in line with recent years.

    sec.gov ↗

  • CIG’s large regulated asset base (generation + network) creates a structural moat because physical grid and hydro reservoirs are high fixed-cost, location-specific assets that limit new entrants and support tariff-based recovery of invested capital.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Because CIG’s generation is materially exposed to hydropower, hydrological conditions are a leading driver of margins — normal/above-average inflows preserve gross profit and net income, while multi-year droughts will raise purchase costs and compress margins.

    sec.gov ↗

  • CIG’s ability to convert accounting earnings into free cash and to finance/receive tariff recovery for capex will determine shareholder returns; persistent declines in operating cash flow versus accounting profits would signal structural stress in working capital, procurement costs or regulatory.

    sec.gov ↗

Bear case: what would count against it

  • ANEEL tariff formula changes that remove automatic cost-recovery or lower allowed returns.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Regulatory refusal to allow capex recovery in future tariff cycles or a regime that shifts more fixed costs to shareholders.

    sec.gov ↗

  • Multi-year below-average rainfall reducing reservoir levels and domestic hydro generation, forcing expensive spot purchases.

    sec.gov ↗

Thesis-Break Engine

Thesis-break watch · Energy Co of Minas Gerais

Loading the break-condition record for Energy Co of Minas Gerais.

How the Thesis-Break Engine works →Historical outcomes are measured against the market after past breaks of the same kind, across all companies. Not a prediction.

MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

The numbers behind the thesis

Sourced from filings and market data

What Changed

  1. Mixed
    Foreign issuer material report (6-K).

    Energy Co Of Minas Gerais filed an SEC report on 2026-09-09: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  2. Mixed
    Foreign issuer material report (6-K).

    Energy Co Of Minas Gerais filed an SEC report on 2026-06-09: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

  3. Mixed
    Foreign issuer material report (6-K).

    Energy Co Of Minas Gerais filed an SEC report on 2026-04-24: Foreign issuer material report (6-K). It is a dated development that tests the current thesis.

Risks / falsifiers

What could break the thesis

  • ANEEL tariff formula changes that remove automatic cost-recovery or lower allowed returns.
  • Regulatory refusal to allow capex recovery in future tariff cycles or a regime that shifts more fixed costs to shareholders.
  • Multi-year below-average rainfall reducing reservoir levels and domestic hydro generation, forcing expensive spot purchases.
  • Large capex projects not accepted into regulatory base (denied tariff recovery) or a spike in working capital needs.

CIG news

Loading headlines…

Financial statements

CIG income statement

Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.

CIG: quick answers

Have members of Congress traded CIG?
1 trade in CIG has been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed CIG trade
ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.