Sphere 3D
ANYUSD
- Source valuation snapshot. Not a live recalculation.
- Latest filed annual earnings; price snapshot date unavailable. Not forward P/E.
- Diluted earnings per share from the latest filed annual.
- — Prior regular-session close from the quote source.
- — Regular-session low and high so far today.
- — Regular-session shares traded.
- Not yet confirmed The company has not confirmed its next report date. Reported quarters are available in the chart’s Earnings view.
- — 52-week trading low and high returned by the quote source.
Understand the Business
Why the Stock Moved
Period-matched expectations history is not yet available. Current metrics are not a substitute for a historical explanation.
The core investment thesis
Own ANY if owned power infrastructure, newer ASICs, and the Cathedra combination materially lower mining costs before cash burn forces more dilution.
ANY price history
Loading ANY and S&P 500 price history…
Loading recent earnings…
Investment thesis
What must happen next
Vertical integration through the Iowa Site and the proposed Cathedra combination must lower Sphere 3D’s cost to mine Bitcoin versus reliance on third-party hosting; otherwise the business remains a commodity miner without pricing power.WeakeningMateriality: High
MD&A says the self-owned 8 MW Iowa Site allows Sphere 3D to reduce reliance on third parties and decrease the overall cost to mine a Bitcoin. If owned power lowers unit costs, Bitcoin upside can flow to owners; if not, revenue growth can still destroy value through operating losses.
Watch: The Cathedra transaction fails to receive regulatory, court, or shareholder approvals.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
MD&A says the self-owned 8 MW Iowa Site allows Sphere 3D to reduce reliance on third parties and decrease the.
Open source ↗The newer-generation miner refresh must convert better joules-per-terahash efficiency into higher deployed exahash, overcoming the production disruption caused by retiring older miners.HoldingMateriality: High
MD&A says average miner efficiency improved to 22.0 J/TH at December 31, 2025 from 27.1 J/TH in 2024, with an expected improvement to approximately 19.0 J/TH in 2026. Efficiency only matters if machines are deployed and hashing; otherwise the refresh consumes time and capital while Bitcoin production falls.
Watch: Deployment delays keep newly acquired miners offline or running below expected speed.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
MD&A says average miner efficiency improved to 22.0 J/TH at December 31, 2025 from 27.1 J/TH in 2024, with an.
Open source ↗Because all revenue now comes from Bitcoin mining, Sphere 3D’s demand engine is the Bitcoin protocol reward system and Bitcoin price, not customer relationships; the business needs favorable Bitcoin economics to make its cost reductions matter.WeakeningMateriality: Medium
MD&A states that during 2025 and 2024 all revenue was derived from Bitcoin mining. Owners are exposed to a protocol-and-commodity cycle: operational improvements may be swamped by Bitcoin price declines, lower rewards, or rising network difficulty.
Watch: A sustained Bitcoin price decline reduces the dollar value of block rewards earned by Sphere 3D.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
MD&A states that during 2025 and 2024 all revenue was derived from Bitcoin mining.
Open source ↗The balance sheet must fund the fleet refresh and infrastructure transition without repeated punitive equity issuance; otherwise any operational improvement may accrue to new capital rather than existing shareholders.WeakeningMateriality: Medium
Cash was $3.7 million at December 31, 2025, while liabilities were $1.8 million and stockholders’ equity was $23.3 million. For a microcap miner, survival and dilution are central to per-share value, not just Bitcoin production.
Watch: Capital markets for small Bitcoin miners close or become available only at deeply dilutive prices.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Cash was $3.7 million at December 31, 2025, while liabilities were $1.8 million and stockholders’ equity was $23.3 million.
Open source ↗The all-stock Cathedra acquisition must add useful power infrastructure, operational efficiency, and scale rather than simply increasing the share base of an already unprofitable miner.HoldingMateriality: Medium
Item 1 says the Cathedra combination is intended to create a high-density computing power infrastructure company focused on high-performance compute, digital assets, energy optimization, and power and infrastructure development. If Cathedra brings low-cost infrastructure, it can improve the cost curve; if not, existing owners face dilution without a stronger mining engine.
Watch: Regulatory, court, or shareholder approvals for the Cathedra arrangement are not obtained.
Supporting sources
Source notes are factual paraphrases; read the original disclosures below.
Item 1 says the Cathedra combination is intended to create a high-density computing power infrastructure company focused on high-performance compute.
Open source ↗
Full investment case & evidence
Loading the original research archive…
Original research
Vertical integration through the Iowa Site and the proposed Cathedra combination must lower Sphere 3D’s cost to mine Bitcoin versus reliance on third-party hosting; otherwise the business remains a commodity miner without pricing power. If owned power lowers unit costs, Bitcoin upside can flow to owners; if not, revenue growth can still destroy value through operating losses.
The newer-generation miner refresh must convert better joules-per-terahash efficiency into higher deployed exahash, overcoming the production disruption caused by retiring older miners. Efficiency only matters if machines are deployed and hashing; otherwise the refresh consumes time and capital while Bitcoin production falls.
Because all revenue now comes from Bitcoin mining, Sphere 3D’s demand engine is the Bitcoin protocol reward system and Bitcoin price, not customer relationships; the business needs favorable Bitcoin economics to make its cost reductions matter. Owners are exposed to a protocol-and-commodity cycle: operational improvements may be swamped by Bitcoin price declines, lower rewards, or rising network difficulty.
The balance sheet must fund the fleet refresh and infrastructure transition without repeated punitive equity issuance; otherwise any operational improvement may accrue to new capital rather than existing shareholders. For a microcap miner, survival and dilution are central to per-share value, not just Bitcoin production.
The all-stock Cathedra acquisition must add useful power infrastructure, operational efficiency, and scale rather than simply increasing the share base of an already unprofitable miner. If Cathedra brings low-cost infrastructure, it can improve the cost curve; if not, existing owners face dilution without a stronger mining engine.
All standing thesis claims
Original report summary
owned power infrastructure, newer ASICs, and the Cathedra combination materially lower mining costs before cash burn forces more dilution.
Bull case and bear case
Bull case and bear case for Sphere 3D
Where the evidence on Sphere 3D disagrees: Mixed on the latest evidence (Oct 15, 2026). Of its 5 thesis points, 2 holding and 3 weakening.
Bull case: what the evidence supports
The newer-generation miner refresh must convert better joules-per-terahash efficiency into higher deployed exahash, overcoming the production disruption caused by retiring older miners.
The all-stock Cathedra acquisition must add useful power infrastructure, operational efficiency, and scale rather than simply increasing the share base of an already unprofitable miner.
Bear case: what the evidence questions
Vertical integration through the Iowa Site and the proposed Cathedra combination must lower Sphere 3D’s cost to mine Bitcoin versus reliance on third-party hosting; otherwise the business remains a commodity miner without pricing power.
Because all revenue now comes from Bitcoin mining, Sphere 3D’s demand engine is the Bitcoin protocol reward system and Bitcoin price, not customer relationships; the business needs favorable Bitcoin economics to make its cost reductions matter.
The balance sheet must fund the fleet refresh and infrastructure transition without repeated punitive equity issuance; otherwise any operational improvement may accrue to new capital rather than existing shareholders.
Thesis-Break Engine
Thesis-break watch · Sphere 3D
Loading the break-condition record for Sphere 3D.
MARKET + FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
The numbers behind the thesis
What Changed
No assessed change was returned in this research window. That can reflect a quiet period or a coverage limit.
Risks / falsifiers
What could break the thesis
- The Cathedra transaction fails to receive regulatory, court, or shareholder approvals.
- Deployment delays keep newly acquired miners offline or running below expected speed.
- A sustained Bitcoin price decline reduces the dollar value of block rewards earned by Sphere 3D.
- Capital markets for small Bitcoin miners close or become available only at deeply dilutive prices.
- Regulatory, court, or shareholder approvals for the Cathedra arrangement are not obtained.
ANY news
Loading headlines…
Financial statements
ANY income statement
Annual filed results · USD · Oldest to newest. Margins are calculated from the reported figures.
ANY: quick answers
- Have members of Congress traded ANY?
- 1 trade in ANY has been disclosed under the STOCK Act by members of Congress, the President or senior officials, none in reports made public in the last 90 days. Every disclosed ANY trade