Profitable wallet strategy · One trader's method, from the public record

Ether trader closed a $3.1 million short for $95,349 after a $1.7 million month

The account bought back nearly 1,497 Ether at an average of $2,082.39. Its earlier monthly record already showed $1.58 million in realized gains on Ether shorts.

A Hyperliquid trader booked $95,349 before fees Tuesday morning by closing an EtherETH+0.26% perpetual futures short. The gain came after the exchange had already recorded $1.71 million in monthly perps profit for the account.

The trader had sold contracts covering 1,496.7163 Ether at an average of $2,146.11 on Monday. A short gains when the repurchase price falls. At 9:40 a.m. Eastern Tuesday, 109 fills bought back the entire position in about five seconds at an average of $2,082.39. The exchange charged $346 on the exit.

Gross profit on perp closes in the reporting window

Realized gains on closes and partial closes from October 10 through 5:22 a.m. Eastern on November 10, before fees and funding. The later Ether buyback falls outside this window.

Gross profit on perp closes in the reporting window
ETH+$1.6 million
BTC+$20,000
HYPE+$12,000
Monthly perps profit
$1.71 million
Through 5:22 a.m. Eastern on November 10
Ether profit realized in that window
$1.58 million
Perp closes before fees and funding
Later Ether buyback
$95,349
Gross realized profit at 9:40 a.m. Eastern

Two cuts of the same trade

At 5:22 a.m. Tuesday, the short had shown an $80,232 paper gain on roughly $3.13 million of exposure. By the time the account bought it back, the price had dropped another $10 per Ether. The $95,349 was the gross realized result for the position, including the gain already visible that morning.

The account had selected 20 times leverage. Its combined spot and perps balance was $13.23 million at the earlier check, and the short used shared collateral. The position represented about 24 cents of exposure for every dollar of that balance.

Where the monthly profit came from

Between October 10 and the 5:22 a.m. cutoff on November 10, the account traded $74.64 million of perps. Closed Ether shorts produced $1,582,856 before fees and funding. BitcoinBTC+0.35% closes added $20,459 and HYPE-0.35% closes added $11,845. Across the three markets, the trader paid $21,690 in trading fees and received $40,924 in funding, the periodic payments between longs and shorts.

The exchange’s $1.71 million performance figure also reflects changes in open positions. Adding the later $95,349 buyback to that figure would count some of Tuesday morning’s gain twice. The combined account balance moved from $13.84 million to $13.23 million over the reporting window; that change also includes activity outside perps.

What adding to losing positions contributed

The account added exposure to 19 completed positions after prices had moved more than 0.5% against their average entry. Those positions earned about $3.31 million before fees in the available fill history going back to June. That wider window includes trades outside the monthly figures above.

A replay that skipped those additions and closed the same fraction of the smaller position at each actual exit price produced about $1.48 million before fees. Keeping the fills and exit prices fixed makes that a measure of how position size affected these trades. It cannot establish how the trader would have managed the smaller positions.

How this was reported. Updated November 10 with the full Ether buyback. The monthly account figures were observed at 5:22 a.m. Eastern, before the original article appeared. Spot executions are excluded from the perp totals. The historical replay uses positions with reconstructable entries and exits.

Sources and data receipts (2)
  • Hyperliquid account record Public trades for account 0xfb94…0ddf, including the November 10 Ether buyback.
  • Hyperliquid info API Account performance, individual fills, time-weighted order fills, funding payments and open positions. The performance window and the later buyback were checked separately.
How perps work
  • A perp (perpetual future) is a contract that tracks a price with no expiry date, so a trader can hold a bet that it rises (long) or falls (short) for as long as they like.
  • Funding is a small payment between the two sides on a schedule (every hour on some venues, every eight hours on others): when the perp trades above the price it tracks, longs pay shorts, and when it trades below, shorts pay longs.
  • Open interest is the value of all positions still open. Every long has a short on the other side, so it is one net figure, not a count of buyers or sellers.
  • Leverage lets a trader control a position larger than their deposit, up to a cap the venue sets for each market, such as 20x.
  • Liquidation is the venue closing all or part of a position when the equity supporting it falls below the required maintenance margin. The trigger depends on the venue's rules, collateral, other positions sharing that collateral, fees and funding. A leverage setting alone does not determine the liquidation price.
  • What the price follows is the venue's choice: each venue decides which index or contract its perp tracks, so two venues' "oil" or "gold" perps can follow different things.

Sai Mukkamala is the lead engineer of OptimistFi, building the data systems behind its perps coverage, and an active voice in the perps community. At OptimistFi, Sai covers the venues, the data and the industry news that move the perps market. Tips: hello@optimistfi.com

Keep reading

All perps news

About OptimistFi Perps · Standards and corrections · Tips and contact

ScoutJUST THIS STORY

LET’S MAKE THIS USEFUL · 1 OF 5

How would you like me to explain this?

Tell me what you want from this read. Start with a quick note, then adjust the details. Your other stories stay as they are.

We’ll remember your view of this story. The published article stays unchanged.

THIS STORY’S READING VIEWStandard · The whole picture

Clear explanations with context. Both sides of the evidence.